Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 29.
43. lappuse
... motion to dissolve the interference may be made under Rule 232 ( a ) , which enlarges slightly the grounds for the motion as set forth in old Rule 122 : " Motions to dissolve an interference may be brought on the ground ( 1 ) that there ...
... motion to dissolve the interference may be made under Rule 232 ( a ) , which enlarges slightly the grounds for the motion as set forth in old Rule 122 : " Motions to dissolve an interference may be brought on the ground ( 1 ) that there ...
46. lappuse
... motion to dissolve an interference involving a patent as follows : " When one of the parties to the interference is a patentee , no motion to dissolve may be brought by any party on the ground that the subject matter of a count is ...
... motion to dissolve an interference involving a patent as follows : " When one of the parties to the interference is a patentee , no motion to dissolve may be brought by any party on the ground that the subject matter of a count is ...
55. lappuse
... motion but may in a proper case move to dissolve the interference , shift the burden of proof , and amend the interference issue , and to declare another interference , at one time , but each should be separately and adequately stated .
... motion but may in a proper case move to dissolve the interference , shift the burden of proof , and amend the interference issue , and to declare another interference , at one time , but each should be separately and adequately stated .
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
according action affidavits amend application assignee Attorneys Board burden of proof CCPA claims considered copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact failing ference filed filing date final hearing follows function further given granted ground held inter interference counts interference proceeding interpreted involved issue judgment Junior limited Manual means ment motion period motion to dissolve noted notice Objections obtained old Rule operation original panels Party's Patent Appeals Patent Office petition practice preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation request respect result senior party specified steps structure subject matter submitted suggested taken taking testimony tion United USPQ