Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 12.
3. lappuse
... limited to two types : 1. When there are two or more applications for patent pending in the Patent Office which , in the opinion of the Commissioner , would interfere with one another . 2. When there is pending in that office an applica ...
... limited to two types : 1. When there are two or more applications for patent pending in the Patent Office which , in the opinion of the Commissioner , would interfere with one another . 2. When there is pending in that office an applica ...
39. lappuse
... limited in his choice by the provisions of new Rule 225 , as previously stated , to motions other than one denying the patentability of any claim constituting a count of the interference . Other parties are not so limited . The selec ...
... limited in his choice by the provisions of new Rule 225 , as previously stated , to motions other than one denying the patentability of any claim constituting a count of the interference . Other parties are not so limited . The selec ...
106. lappuse
... limited than proposed Count A and is directed , as are Counts 4 and 5 , to the structure as installed . Proposed Count C is designed to define the invention of Count 4 somewhat more broadly , eliminating the overlapping fea- ture and ...
... limited than proposed Count A and is directed , as are Counts 4 and 5 , to the structure as installed . Proposed Count C is designed to define the invention of Count 4 somewhat more broadly , eliminating the overlapping fea- ture and ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
according action affidavits amend application assignee Attorneys Board burden of proof CCPA claims considered copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact failing ference filed filing date final hearing follows function further given granted ground held inter interference counts interference proceeding interpreted involved issue judgment Junior limited Manual means ment motion period motion to dissolve noted notice Objections obtained old Rule operation original panels Party's Patent Appeals Patent Office petition practice preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation request respect result senior party specified steps structure subject matter submitted suggested taken taking testimony tion United USPQ