Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 6.
16. lappuse
... interpreted in the light of the application in which it originated.3 A count will not be interpreted so broadly as to depart from the construction which was given it when it was allowed over the prior art considered in the proceedings ...
... interpreted in the light of the application in which it originated.3 A count will not be interpreted so broadly as to depart from the construction which was given it when it was allowed over the prior art considered in the proceedings ...
86. lappuse
... interpreted to mean movement longitudinally of the axis of the car , as contended by the adverse party , the count would read on a prior art patent . The court while recognizing the rule that interference counts gener- ally are to be ...
... interpreted to mean movement longitudinally of the axis of the car , as contended by the adverse party , the count would read on a prior art patent . The court while recognizing the rule that interference counts gener- ally are to be ...
116. lappuse
Benton Baker. ( 4 ) The count should be interpreted according to the disclosure of the patent of in which it origi- --9 nated . The Interference Counts Count 1 , which derives from claim 1 of ... Interpreted According To The Dis- closure 116.
Benton Baker. ( 4 ) The count should be interpreted according to the disclosure of the patent of in which it origi- --9 nated . The Interference Counts Count 1 , which derives from claim 1 of ... Interpreted According To The Dis- closure 116.
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
according action affidavits amend application assignee Attorneys Board burden of proof CCPA claims considered copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact failing ference filed filing date final hearing follows function further given granted ground held inter interference counts interference proceeding interpreted involved issue judgment Junior limited Manual means ment motion period motion to dissolve noted notice Objections obtained old Rule operation original panels Party's Patent Appeals Patent Office petition practice preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation request respect result senior party specified steps structure subject matter submitted suggested taken taking testimony tion United USPQ