Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 62.
86. lappuse
... interference counts . In cases of the latter type a different rule applies when a count is derived from a claim of an existing patent . In Kliesrath and Sanford v . Kesling , 154 F. 2d 514 ( CCPA ) , involving interference counts ...
... interference counts . In cases of the latter type a different rule applies when a count is derived from a claim of an existing patent . In Kliesrath and Sanford v . Kesling , 154 F. 2d 514 ( CCPA ) , involving interference counts ...
116. lappuse
... Counts Count 1 , which derives from claim 1 of Patent No. reads as follows : -------- ( here recite counts ) Count 2 , which derives from claim 2 of the said patent , reads as follows : ( here recite counts ) It is apparent that the two ...
... Counts Count 1 , which derives from claim 1 of Patent No. reads as follows : -------- ( here recite counts ) Count 2 , which derives from claim 2 of the said patent , reads as follows : ( here recite counts ) It is apparent that the two ...
125. lappuse
... Interference Examiners rendered on the sixth day of January , 1947 ... counts constituting the inter- ference issue to the senior party , ... and 2 ... interference are supported in the application of the said senior party . 4. The Board ...
... Interference Examiners rendered on the sixth day of January , 1947 ... counts constituting the inter- ference issue to the senior party , ... and 2 ... interference are supported in the application of the said senior party . 4. The Board ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
according action affidavits amend application assignee Attorneys Board burden of proof CCPA claims considered copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact failing ference filed filing date final hearing follows function further given granted ground held inter interference counts interference proceeding interpreted involved issue judgment Junior limited Manual means ment motion period motion to dissolve noted notice Objections obtained old Rule operation original panels Party's Patent Appeals Patent Office petition practice preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation request respect result senior party specified steps structure subject matter submitted suggested taken taking testimony tion United USPQ