Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 24.
17. lappuse
... given the meaning which was given it in the proceedings resulting in the issuance of the patent.1 In other words , the meaning of the issue must be determined by the specification of the patent from which it derived.2 Attorneys ...
... given the meaning which was given it in the proceedings resulting in the issuance of the patent.1 In other words , the meaning of the issue must be determined by the specification of the patent from which it derived.2 Attorneys ...
52. lappuse
... given the benefit of such an application.1 The considerations involved on such a motion are stated in Sec . 1105.04 of the Manual , as follows : “ In deciding a motion of this nature , it is usually advisable first to determine exactly ...
... given the benefit of such an application.1 The considerations involved on such a motion are stated in Sec . 1105.04 of the Manual , as follows : “ In deciding a motion of this nature , it is usually advisable first to determine exactly ...
53. lappuse
... given the benefit of a foreign filing date in the original declaration of an interference , even though favorable ac- tion had been stated in a request under Section I of Public Law 690. The party having a foreign filing date may ...
... given the benefit of a foreign filing date in the original declaration of an interference , even though favorable ac- tion had been stated in a request under Section I of Public Law 690. The party having a foreign filing date may ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
according action affidavits amend application assignee Attorneys Board burden of proof CCPA claims considered copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact failing ference filed filing date final hearing follows function further given granted ground held inter interference counts interference proceeding interpreted involved issue judgment Junior limited Manual means ment motion period motion to dissolve noted notice Objections obtained old Rule operation original panels Party's Patent Appeals Patent Office petition practice preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation request respect result senior party specified steps structure subject matter submitted suggested taken taking testimony tion United USPQ