Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 13.
14. lappuse
... defined in a generic count constitutes a constructive reduction to practice of that invention so as to defeat an ... define a broader concept than that dis- closed by the applicant's specific example.5 A disclosure is adequate if the ...
... defined in a generic count constitutes a constructive reduction to practice of that invention so as to defeat an ... define a broader concept than that dis- closed by the applicant's specific example.5 A disclosure is adequate if the ...
19. lappuse
... defined in only as many counts as may be necessary to define the interfering subject matter ( but in the case of an interference with a patent all the claims of the patent which can be made by the applicant should con- stitute the ...
... defined in only as many counts as may be necessary to define the interfering subject matter ( but in the case of an interference with a patent all the claims of the patent which can be made by the applicant should con- stitute the ...
106. lappuse
... define an important feature of the invention , namely , the provision for telescoping of the panels under pressure , which is not present in any of the references , more clearly and in some respects more broadly than it is defined in ...
... define an important feature of the invention , namely , the provision for telescoping of the panels under pressure , which is not present in any of the references , more clearly and in some respects more broadly than it is defined in ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
according action affidavits amend application assignee Attorneys Board burden of proof CCPA claims considered copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact failing ference filed filing date final hearing follows function further given granted ground held inter interference counts interference proceeding interpreted involved issue judgment Junior limited Manual means ment motion period motion to dissolve noted notice Objections obtained old Rule operation original panels Party's Patent Appeals Patent Office petition practice preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation request respect result senior party specified steps structure subject matter submitted suggested taken taking testimony tion United USPQ