Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 31.
21. lappuse
... considered without the consent of the Commissioner , except as provided by these rules . Proposed amendments di- rected toward the declaration of an interference with another party will be considered to the extent neces- sary . Ex parte ...
... considered without the consent of the Commissioner , except as provided by these rules . Proposed amendments di- rected toward the declaration of an interference with another party will be considered to the extent neces- sary . Ex parte ...
44. lappuse
... considered but affidavits relating to the prior art may be considered by analogy to Rule 132 . " If there is considerable doubt as to whether or not a party's application discloses the subject matter in issue or is operative and it ...
... considered but affidavits relating to the prior art may be considered by analogy to Rule 132 . " If there is considerable doubt as to whether or not a party's application discloses the subject matter in issue or is operative and it ...
51. lappuse
... considered . " In other words , there is no motion period in an interfer- ence declared on motion in a previously ... considered , but affidavits relating to the prior art may be considered by analogy to Rule 132 . " If a motion under ...
... considered . " In other words , there is no motion period in an interfer- ence declared on motion in a previously ... considered , but affidavits relating to the prior art may be considered by analogy to Rule 132 . " If a motion under ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
according action affidavits amend application assignee Attorneys Board burden of proof CCPA claims considered copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact failing ference filed filing date final hearing follows function further given granted ground held inter interference counts interference proceeding interpreted involved issue judgment Junior limited Manual means ment motion period motion to dissolve noted notice Objections obtained old Rule operation original panels Party's Patent Appeals Patent Office petition practice preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation request respect result senior party specified steps structure subject matter submitted suggested taken taking testimony tion United USPQ