Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 9.
44. lappuse
... Affidavits relating to the disclosure of a party's application as , for example , on the matter of operativeness or right to make , should not be considered but affidavits relating to the prior art may be considered by analogy to Rule ...
... Affidavits relating to the disclosure of a party's application as , for example , on the matter of operativeness or right to make , should not be considered but affidavits relating to the prior art may be considered by analogy to Rule ...
51. lappuse
... Affidavits are occasionaly offered in support of or in opposi- tion to motions under Rules 233 and 234. The practice here is the same as in the case of affidavits concerning Rule 232 motions , that is , affidavits relating to disclosure ...
... Affidavits are occasionaly offered in support of or in opposi- tion to motions under Rules 233 and 234. The practice here is the same as in the case of affidavits concerning Rule 232 motions , that is , affidavits relating to disclosure ...
52. lappuse
... affidavits under Rule 131 in the application file of the party involved . These affidavits should not be opened to the inspection of opposing parties and no reference should be made to the dates of invention set forth therein other than ...
... affidavits under Rule 131 in the application file of the party involved . These affidavits should not be opened to the inspection of opposing parties and no reference should be made to the dates of invention set forth therein other than ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
according action affidavits amend application assignee Attorneys Board burden of proof CCPA claims considered copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact failing ference filed filing date final hearing follows function further given granted ground held inter interference counts interference proceeding interpreted involved issue judgment Junior limited Manual means ment motion period motion to dissolve noted notice Objections obtained old Rule operation original panels Party's Patent Appeals Patent Office petition practice preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation request respect result senior party specified steps structure subject matter submitted suggested taken taking testimony tion United USPQ