Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 11.
103. lappuse
... according to the specification of the Junior Party , is accomplished by clips 26 , 26 ( ......... application , p . 6 , line 9 ) . The description of the structure in this respect contains no mention of resilience in re- spect to the ...
... according to the specification of the Junior Party , is accomplished by clips 26 , 26 ( ......... application , p . 6 , line 9 ) . The description of the structure in this respect contains no mention of resilience in re- spect to the ...
115. lappuse
... application of without in- terpreting the count in a manner inconsistent with its language and incompatible with the disclosure of the said patent , which is not permissible . and ( 4 ) The count should be interpreted according to 115.
... application of without in- terpreting the count in a manner inconsistent with its language and incompatible with the disclosure of the said patent , which is not permissible . and ( 4 ) The count should be interpreted according to 115.
116. lappuse
Benton Baker. ( 4 ) The count should be interpreted according to the disclosure of the patent of in which it origi- --9 nated . The Interference Counts Count 1 , which derives from claim 1 of Patent No. reads as follows : -------- ( here ...
Benton Baker. ( 4 ) The count should be interpreted according to the disclosure of the patent of in which it origi- --9 nated . The Interference Counts Count 1 , which derives from claim 1 of Patent No. reads as follows : -------- ( here ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
according action affidavits amend application assignee Attorneys Board burden of proof CCPA claims considered copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact failing ference filed filing date final hearing follows function further given granted ground held inter interference counts interference proceeding interpreted involved issue judgment Junior limited Manual means ment motion period motion to dissolve noted notice Objections obtained old Rule operation original panels Party's Patent Appeals Patent Office petition practice preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation request respect result senior party specified steps structure subject matter submitted suggested taken taking testimony tion United USPQ