Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1958 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 30.
17. lappuse
... Attorneys ; Representation of Parties with Conflicting Interests It is the duty of the examiner , under Rule 208 , whenever it is found that two or more parties having conflicting interests are represented by the same attorney or agent ...
... Attorneys ; Representation of Parties with Conflicting Interests It is the duty of the examiner , under Rule 208 , whenever it is found that two or more parties having conflicting interests are represented by the same attorney or agent ...
58. lappuse
... attorney should bear in mind the provisions of Rule 346 , which read : " Every paper filed by an attorney or agent repre- senting an applicant or party to a proceeding in the Patent Office must bear the signature of such attorney or ...
... attorney should bear in mind the provisions of Rule 346 , which read : " Every paper filed by an attorney or agent repre- senting an applicant or party to a proceeding in the Patent Office must bear the signature of such attorney or ...
98. lappuse
... attorneys , that the time for filing preliminary statements in the above entitled in- terference be extended for thirty ( 30 ) days , to May 12 , 1954 . Chicago , Illinois April 6 , 1954 Attorneys for the Parties ( Name of party ) Attorneys ...
... attorneys , that the time for filing preliminary statements in the above entitled in- terference be extended for thirty ( 30 ) days , to May 12 , 1954 . Chicago , Illinois April 6 , 1954 Attorneys for the Parties ( Name of party ) Attorneys ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
according action affidavits amend application assignee Attorneys Board burden of proof CCPA claims considered copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled establish et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact failing ference filed filing date final hearing follows function further given granted ground held inter interference counts interference proceeding interpreted involved issue judgment Junior limited Manual means ment motion period motion to dissolve noted notice Objections obtained old Rule operation original panels Party's Patent Appeals Patent Office petition practice preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention Procedure proceedings proposed Count question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation request respect result senior party specified steps structure subject matter submitted suggested taken taking testimony tion United USPQ