Patent Practice & Management for Inventors and ExecutivesScarsdale Press, 1950 - 371 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 59.
166. lappuse
... party is patentable to both parties . For this reason , interferences are not instituted ordinarily until one application at least is in condition for allowance . When the dates of filing of the applications that contain interfering ...
... party is patentable to both parties . For this reason , interferences are not instituted ordinarily until one application at least is in condition for allowance . When the dates of filing of the applications that contain interfering ...
169. lappuse
... party to file a Preliminary Statement will restrict him to his filing date . This means , in the case of a junior party , loss of the interference ( unless he can prove in- operativeness of the invention of the senior party ) ; the senior ...
... party to file a Preliminary Statement will restrict him to his filing date . This means , in the case of a junior party , loss of the interference ( unless he can prove in- operativeness of the invention of the senior party ) ; the senior ...
170. lappuse
... party gets a patent on the subject matter of the counts involved in the motion . Such motion is not in order when one of the parties to the interference already has a patent on the subject matter , since the patentability in this case ...
... party gets a patent on the subject matter of the counts involved in the motion . Such motion is not in order when one of the parties to the interference already has a patent on the subject matter , since the patentability in this case ...
Saturs
SELECTION | 43 |
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS | 59 |
CLAIM DRAFTING | 106 |
Autortiesības | |
20 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
agreement allowed amendment amount Appeals application for patent assignment attorney award beneficiary cancelled capital chemical circumstances claims Company compound compulsory license considered contract Corp cost countries Court held damages date of invention decision determine dibutyl phthalate disclaimer disclosed disclosure discovery double patenting dry ice effect element employee Examiner executive expected expense feature filing date foreign patent granted guanidine improvement income instance interference interference proceeding inventor inventorship involved issuance lacquer LICENSOR machine manufacture material ment method ordinarily original patent party patent infringement patent issued patent law patent license Patent Office patent owner patent rights patentable subject matter payment period prior art profit prove pyroxylin reason recited reduction to practice reissue application reissue patent result royalty secret information specification statement subject matter suit for infringement Supreme Court tion unpatented usually validity vention