Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

FOREWORD

This report on Court Proceedings and Actions of Vital Interest to the Congress is the fifth edition prepared and published by the House Committee on the Judiciary. Since May 8, 1979, when the Speaker of the House conferred upon the Committee the statutory responsibility of identifying court cases of special importance to the Congress, we have endeavored to prepare our reports in a manner that would satisfy the needs of both the serious scholar and the newcomer to the field. Thus our reports contain not only the complete texts of numerous court opinions for those who seek a thorough understanding of the meaning and implications of a decision, but also case summaries for those who desire a general overview of the newest cases in this expanding area of the law.

Although the decision whether to include a particular case in these reports must, in the final analysis, be a discretionary one, our case selection process is governed by two concerns: (1) the extent to which the case touches upon matters directly involving the rights or responsibilities of Members or employees in the performance of their official acts; and (2) the likelihood that the case can serve as a guide in determining the scope of Congressional power or the boundaries of permissible legislative activity.

I continue to view the Committee's obligation to produce these reports to be of immeasurable importance. In addition to keeping the Congress apprised of the most recent judicial developments, these reports hopefully will help others to understand more fully the rights and responsibilities of Congress and its Members within our system of Government.

PETER W. RODINO, Jr., Chairman, House Committee on the Judiciary.

V. Legislative Immunity and the Speech or Debate
Clause:

McSurely v. McAdams

Benford v. American Broadcasting Compa-
nies, Inc........

Page

179

191

Brown v. American Broadcasting Compa-
nies, Inc....

[blocks in formation]

American Family Life Assurance of Colum-
bus v. American Broadcasting Companies,

Inc .....

Jones v. Guthrie

United States v. Myers (criminal)

United States v. Kelly

United States v. Jenrette..

United States v. Murphy (criminal)..

United States v. Thompson (criminal)............
United States v. Williams

VI. Challenges to the Internal Rules of Congress and the
Statutes Under Which Congress Operates:

Murray v. Buchanan

Common Cause v. Bolger

Laxalt v. Kimmitt...

Vander Jagt v. O'Neill

VII. The Constitutionality of the Legislative Veto and the
Use of the Legislative Directive:

Chadha v. Immigration and Naturalization
Service

226

240

260

263

274

Consumer Energy Council of America v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.....
Process Gas Consumers Group v. Consumer
Energy Council of America....

284

284

[blocks in formation]

League of Women Voters of California v.
Federal Communications Commission

IX. Attempts To Obtain Congressional Documents and
Testimony Through Use of the Subpoena:

352

1. Civil Proceedings:
United States v. Eilberg..

121

In Re: IBP Confidential Business Documents
Litigation.....

367

IX. Attempts To Obtain Congressional Documents and
Testimony Through Use of the Subpoena-Contin-

[blocks in formation]

United States v. Roth....

United States v. Accardo

Rose Hall Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Over-
seas Banking Corporation and Holiday
Inns, Inc......

Common Cause v. Bolger

2. Criminal Proceedings:

X. Congressionally Related Documents and the Freedom

408

240

412

420

.......

of Information Act:

Holy Spirit Association for the Unification

of World Christianity v. Central Intelli-
gence Agency...

422

Allen v. Federal Bureau of Investigation........
Allen v. Department of Defense..

431

440

[blocks in formation]

Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers.

Simer v. Rios............

467

478

XIII. Balancing the Right To Petition and Communicate
With Congress With the Law of Defamation:

[blocks in formation]

Federal Leasing, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's.

502

Grassley v. Legal Services Corporation

506

League of Women Voters of California v. Federal Communi

[blocks in formation]

Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

578

Simer v. Rios

604

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »