Copyright Holder Protection Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, First Session, on S. 1384 ... November 20, 1985U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986 - 158 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 22.
8. lappuse
... parties relating to the exploitation of that motion picture . The only instrument which can be terminated is the license from the author to the motion picture producer of the underlying work . By exercising that right when he becomes ...
... parties relating to the exploitation of that motion picture . The only instrument which can be terminated is the license from the author to the motion picture producer of the underlying work . By exercising that right when he becomes ...
27. lappuse
... parties before the Copyright Office could not be ignored . Justice White also noted that the majority's decision would frustrate the congressional purpose of compensating authors in those situations where an author has assigned his ...
... parties before the Copyright Office could not be ignored . Justice White also noted that the majority's decision would frustrate the congressional purpose of compensating authors in those situations where an author has assigned his ...
37. lappuse
... parties had been at the time when they negotiated the agreements . " Again the retroactive application was upheld . 54 / As one commentator has noted , " a retroactive statute , by remedying an unexpected judicial decision , may ...
... parties had been at the time when they negotiated the agreements . " Again the retroactive application was upheld . 54 / As one commentator has noted , " a retroactive statute , by remedying an unexpected judicial decision , may ...
38. lappuse
... parties . the issue is much more complex . Following termination , some publishers apparently received royalties for ... parties since 1978 , either before or after the Mills Music decision . Did those third parties change position in ...
... parties . the issue is much more complex . Following termination , some publishers apparently received royalties for ... parties since 1978 , either before or after the Mills Music decision . Did those third parties change position in ...
41. lappuse
... parties . The crucial year on this issue was 1964 , which was before the first hearing on revision in Congress . But there were endless negotiations between the publishers and the authors on how that issue was to be handled . The ...
... parties . The crucial year on this issue was 1964 , which was before the first hearing on revision in Congress . But there were endless negotiations between the publishers and the authors on how that issue was to be handled . The ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
1299 Ocean Avenue amendment Arlen Specter ASCAP author's grant Authors League Barbara Ringer bargaining power benefits Berman book publisher composer Congress intended congressional intent contract Copyright Law Revision Copyright Office copyright term copyrighted work covered Court of Appeals created creators date of termination Dean Kay Dear Dean derivative rights derivative works based derivative works exception effective date exploit Fox license George David Weiss Group 1299 Ocean Harry Fox Agency hearing heirs issue legislative history mechanical royalties middleman Mills Music decision motion picture Music Group 1299 music industry music publishers pay royalties promote protection publisher's recapture receive record companies Register of Copyrights renewal copyright renewal term reversion right to terminate Santa Monica section 304 Senator SPECTER share of royalties song songwriters sound recordings statement statute statutory subsisting copyrights Ted Snyder term of copyright terminated grant termination clause termination provisions termination right U.S. Supreme Court Welk Music Group Who's Sorry windfall writers