Copyright Holder Protection Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, First Session, on S. 1384 ... November 20, 1985U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986 - 158 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 16.
15. lappuse
... covered by the terminated grant . 17 U.S.C. §203 ( b ) ( 1 ) ; §304 ( c ) ( 6 ) ( A ) . In January of this year , the Supreme Court ruled on a case questioning the proper disbursement of royalties for derivative works that " continue to ...
... covered by the terminated grant . 17 U.S.C. §203 ( b ) ( 1 ) ; §304 ( c ) ( 6 ) ( A ) . In January of this year , the Supreme Court ruled on a case questioning the proper disbursement of royalties for derivative works that " continue to ...
18. lappuse
... covered by the terminated transfer . The §16 exception was almost identical . 10 / Barbara Ringer , then the Assistant Register of Copyrights for Examining , explained the background to the two alternatives for a termination provision ...
... covered by the terminated transfer . The §16 exception was almost identical . 10 / Barbara Ringer , then the Assistant Register of Copyrights for Examining , explained the background to the two alternatives for a termination provision ...
21. lappuse
... covered by the terminated grant . 21 / Like both earlier versions , the 1965 bill contains a definition of a " derivative work " that includes sound recordings . 22 / The Register's Supplementary Report described the termination or ...
... covered by the terminated grant . 21 / Like both earlier versions , the 1965 bill contains a definition of a " derivative work " that includes sound recordings . 22 / The Register's Supplementary Report described the termination or ...
27. lappuse
... covered " any right under " that copyright and that it , therefore , included the recapturing of Mills ' right to share royalties . The minority felt that the legislative history did not support Mills ' claim to share in the royalties ...
... covered " any right under " that copyright and that it , therefore , included the recapturing of Mills ' right to share royalties . The minority felt that the legislative history did not support Mills ' claim to share in the royalties ...
44. lappuse
... covered by the ter- minated grant . 17 U.S.C. § 304 ( c ) ( 6 ) ( A ) . The work involved in the Mills case was the 1923 song " Who's Sorry Now ? " . In 1940 the author , Ted Snyder , assigned his rights under the copyright to the music ...
... covered by the ter- minated grant . 17 U.S.C. § 304 ( c ) ( 6 ) ( A ) . The work involved in the Mills case was the 1923 song " Who's Sorry Now ? " . In 1940 the author , Ted Snyder , assigned his rights under the copyright to the music ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
1299 Ocean Avenue amendment Arlen Specter ASCAP author's grant Authors League Barbara Ringer bargaining power benefits Berman book publisher composer Congress intended congressional intent contract Copyright Law Revision Copyright Office copyright term copyrighted work covered Court of Appeals created creators date of termination Dean Kay Dear Dean derivative rights derivative works based derivative works exception effective date exploit Fox license George David Weiss Group 1299 Ocean Harry Fox Agency hearing heirs issue legislative history mechanical royalties middleman Mills Music decision motion picture Music Group 1299 music industry music publishers pay royalties promote protection publisher's recapture receive record companies Register of Copyrights renewal copyright renewal term reversion right to terminate Santa Monica section 304 Senator SPECTER share of royalties song songwriters sound recordings statement statute statutory subsisting copyrights Ted Snyder term of copyright terminated grant termination clause termination provisions termination right U.S. Supreme Court Welk Music Group Who's Sorry windfall writers