Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

APPENDIX V.

THE Appendix here presented to the reader is written with a twofold object. First, to exhibit a Table of all the principal Treaties and Conventions that have been entered into, whether separately or in combination with other powers, between Russia and Turkey from the year 1699 down to the London Conference of 1871, and then to extract from those documents such portions as relate exclusively to the Black Sea and its shores. But before doing this, a word or two may not be out of place on the subject of Treaties of Peace, with reference to the place they ought to occupy in the study of the History of Europe. At few periods of time has the advantage as well as the importance of a careful study of that history been more conspicuous than in the present day. At few periods have the vague declamations and foolish utterances that invariably mark the uninformed or poorly informed writer or speaker been more plentiful than now, when the position and power of Russia, her ambitious aims, and her means of carrying out those aims, have been the subject of daily talk, and when the Eastern question as it is called has been and is the theme of endless, not to say wearisome, discussion. A more enlarged acquaintance with geography has been strongly recommended by a living writer and orator of distinction as a valuable corrective of many of the wild fancies indulged in by a crowd of rash denouncers of Russian wiles and future Russian triumphs in the East. Surely a more enlarged and accurate acquaintance with the political history of Europe during the last two centuries will be an equally valuable aid to some of our political forecasters of events. But how properly to study that history, where to find a good repertory of the facts connected with it? Where to look for real and trustworthy authorities, free from bias and unexcited by fears or fancies? are questions to which a satisfactory answer it is thought can be given. If, to vary somewhat the language of one of our most experienced and trustworthy historians1, the question be, "What is the pro

1 Mr Froude in the Oxford Essays for 1855: "On the best means of teaching English History." An Essay well deserving perusal and reperusal.

per attitude in which an inquirer may place himself towards the history of Europe and devise a plan for economizing his reading, ascertaining at the same time what is of moment and what is not?" the reply may be given-Collect and study carefully all the leading treaties of peace that have been concluded from the time of the Peace of Westphalia down to our own day. They are the great landmarks in the expansive domain of facts spreading over two centuries and a quarter; in them will be found the real story of the different State systems of which Europe has been composed at one period or another; they are objects round which groups of incidents of more or less special importance are collected; startingpoints from which inquiries into the causes of each separate set of complications in modern political history may conveniently proceed, and sigu-posts to direct the inquirer along the confusing routes through which he may have to travel. We shall find in them cause and effect, for in order to appreciate rightly and understand properly the results intended to be secured by them, we must be acquainted with the facts that produced them. Moreover, they will help to solve some of the difficulties which, as Mr Froude points out, the student of English history constantly encounters; for in the first place, they are "authoritative works which can be definitely studied and mastered;" in the next place, all that is of the greatest consequence in the state system of Europe is to be found in them, all the great movements, political and religious, find their centres there; and last and most important of all, the real student of history, not the mere crammer of the opinions of others, can by means of them make for himself, and in his own room, a book through whose aid he can bring to bear upon most of the great international questions of the day, sound reasoning and trustworthy knowledge. It would of course be out of place to dwell upon this subject at further length, or to attempt to show how the study of Treaties of Peace is to be pursued. Some such method as Mr Froude has recommended for the study of English History by means of the Statute-book of England, might easily be sketched out. It is enough to draw attention to the value of Treaties of Peace in relation to History.

1 See Mr Froude's Essay, pp. 69 and 70

[graphic]

A COLLECTION OF ALL THE PRINCIPAL TREATIES AND CONVENTIONS

ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE TWO POWERS OF RUSSIA AND TURKEY,
WHETHER SEPARATELY OR IN COMBINATION WITH OTHER EUROPEAN
POWERS, FROM THE YEAR 1699 TO THE YEAR 1871.

[blocks in formation]

Where to be found.

Dumont VIII. pie 1. p. 297.

Schmauss (C. J. G.) p.
2470. Koch et Schoell,
XIV. p. 299.
Rousset. Supplement II. ple
11. p. 1. Schmauss (C.
J. G.) p. 2471. Koch et
Schoell, xiv. p. 296.
Koch et Schoell, xiv. pp.
302-311, who say that
the Treaty was never
published in any collec-
tion or treatise before
their work, and that that
is why they set it out at
length. See also Mot-
ley's History of Peter the
Great, Vol. III. p. 342.
Wenck, 1. p. 388. Koch
et Schoell, XIV. p. 382.

Wenck, 1. p. 388. Koch et Schoell, xiv. p. 387. Wenck, 1. p. 393. Koch et

Schoell, xiv. p. 387.

Notes.

By this Treaty Georgia fell to the share of
Turkey. Derbend, Bakow, etc. as far as the
river Öttar and the Caspian provinces going
to Russia.

In the course of the short war which preceded
this peace and in which Russia found an
ally in Austria, Azoff was re-conquered and
the Crimea was entered but could not be
retained. One of the terms of the peace
was that Azoff should be razed, but kept
by Russia, whose boundaries were enlarged
in the Ukraine.

[blocks in formation]

Martens, 1. p. 507. Hertslet, |
Map of Europe by Treaty,
Vol. 3. App. p. 2010. See
also Holland's Lecture on
the Treaty relations of
Russia and Turkey.

[blocks in formation]

This is a most important Treaty in the his-
tory of the rivalry of the two Empires. By
it the moral as well as the physical power
of Russia was advanced. The tenor of the
Treaty being (1) Independence of the in-
habitants of the Crimea and the Cuban,
(2) Re-establishment of the principalities
of Moldavia and Wallachia, (3) Retention
by Russia of Kinburn and Azoff, as also
Yénikalé and Kertch, (4) Freedom of com-
mercial navigation in the Black Sea and
in all Turkish Seas. Notice Articles VIII.
relating to the city of Jerusalem and other
holy places, xix. relating to Yénikalé and
Kertch, and XXII. annulling the Treaty of
Belgrade.

By Article LX. the Porte undertakes to pro-
vide for the complete protection of Russian
ships when at sea from the attacks of the
Barbary Pirates, for the protection of Rus-
sian consuls and merchants from such
attacks, and to make good all losses happen-
ing through and from such attacks.
By this Treaty the Crimea and Cuban, which
had been formally occupied in 1783, were
incorporated into the Russian Empire, the
river (Cuban) being agreed on as the bound-
ary line.

By this Treaty Russia obtained Oczakoff with
the strip of land between the Dnieper and
the Dniester; but, except this, all conquests
were restored.

By Article vII. the Porte specially stipulates

[graphic]
« iepriekšējāTurpināt »