Cato Supreme Court Review 2002-2003Born in a high mountain holler, Emerald has inherited the Healer's abilities passed down through her mother's generations. She loves her home and is learning the Healer's ways when her father decides to uproot the family. Leaving their generations behind, they wander north to look for work. A journey through childhood that will touch your heart and cling to your spirit. |
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
| 7 | |
| 21 | |
| 43 | |
Nike v Kasky and the Definition of Commercial Speech | 63 |
Cross Burning Symbolic Speech and the First Amendment Virginia v Black | 81 |
A Missed Opportunity for the Supreme Court to Clarify Application of First Amendment Law to Publicly Funded Expressive Institutions | 105 |
Eldred v Ashcroft and the Logic of a Written Constitution | 131 |
The Conservative Split on Punitive Damages State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co v Campbell | 159 |
Searching for Corruption in All the Wrong Places | 187 |
Much Ado about Nothing? | 223 |
IOLTA Brown v Legal Foundation of Washington and the Taking of Property without the Payment of Compensation | 245 |
October Term 2003 | 271 |
Contributors | 283 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action activity allow Amendment American appearance applied argued argument Association authority award California campaign candidate claim Clause client compelling concern concluded conduct Congress constitutional contributions corporate corruption create cross burning decide decision discrimination discussion dissenting doctrine Due Process effect Election equal evidence example exercise existing expression extension fact Farm federal filters funds held holding important individual institutions interest Internet involving IOLTA issue Judge judicial Justice justify lawyers Legal legislative less liberty libraries limited majority matter means ment Michigan Nike noted opinion particular political practice presented principle Progress prohibited promote protected punitive damages question reason regulation requires restrictions rule School scrutiny sovereign immunity speech statements statute Stevens substantive Supreme Court term Thomas tion tort unconstitutional United University violated Virginia Washington written
Populāri fragmenti
28. lappuse - It is unnecessary to consider now whether legislation which restricts those political processes which can ordinarily be expected to bring about repeal of undesirable legislation, is to be subjected to more exacting judicial scrutiny under the general prohibitions of the Fourteenth Amendment than are most other types of legislation.
12. lappuse - Certainly all those who have framed written Constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be that an act of the Legislature repugnant to the Constitution is void...
26. lappuse - It is enough that there is an evil at hand for correction, and that it might be thought that the particular legislative measure was a rational way to correct it.
30. lappuse - The foregoing cases suggest that specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance.
45. lappuse - When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
12. lappuse - That the people have an original right to establish for their future government such principles as in their opinion shall most conduce to their own happiness is the basis on which the whole American fabric has been erected.
30. lappuse - The Third Amendment in its prohibition against the quartering of soldiers "in any house" in time of peace without the consent of the owner is another facet of that privacy. The Fourth Amendment explicitly affirms the "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." The Fifth Amendment in its Self-Incrimination Clause enables the citizen to create a zone of privacy which government may not force him to surrender to his detriment....
76. lappuse - Freedom of discussion, if it would fulfill its historic function in this nation, must embrace all issues about which information is needed or appropriate to enable the members of society to cope with the exigencies of their period.
28. lappuse - ... prejudice against discrete and insular minorities may be a special condition, which tends seriously to curtail the operation of those political processes ordinarily to be relied upon to protect minorities, and which may call for a correspondinglymore searching judicial inquiry.
246. lappuse - Property does not have rights. People have rights. The right to enjoy property without unlawful deprivation, no less than the right to speak or the right to travel, is in truth a 'personal' right, whether the 'property' in question be a welfare check, a home or a savings account.
Bibliogrāfiskā informācija
| Nosaukums | Cato Supreme Court Review 2002-2003 Cato Supreme Court Review Series |
| Autors | James L. Swanson |
| Redaktors | James L. Swanson |
| Izdevējs | Cato Institute, 2003 |
| ISBN | 193086552X, 9781930865525 |
| Apjoms | 250 lappuses |
| Eksportēt avotu | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |