Study of Monopoly Power: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Study of Monopoly Power of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Eighty-second Congress, First Session, 1. izdevums,5. daļaU.S. Government Printing Office, 1951 Committee Serial No. 1. Focuses on legislation on antitrust law statute of limitations and U.S. recovery of damages in antitrust suits; Considers legislation to revise price discrimination good faith defense provisions. Focuses on distribution costs and nature of good faith price competition; Considers legislation to exempt baseball and other sports from antitrust law provisions. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 30.
14. lappuse
... monopolistic or tending to monopoly . To adopt the suggestion of the Commission as to legislation which would permit a showing of a substantial injury to competition to override a good- faith meeting of competition defense would result ...
... monopolistic or tending to monopoly . To adopt the suggestion of the Commission as to legislation which would permit a showing of a substantial injury to competition to override a good- faith meeting of competition defense would result ...
22. lappuse
... monopolistic and unfair practices . Still I understood you to say , and I agree with you , that Mr. B , or C , or D , or E could plead his good faith and absolve himself even though the practices of all result in a monopolistic practice ...
... monopolistic and unfair practices . Still I understood you to say , and I agree with you , that Mr. B , or C , or D , or E could plead his good faith and absolve himself even though the practices of all result in a monopolistic practice ...
26. lappuse
... monopolistic and oppressive practices . H. R. 2820 is in two sections - the first amending section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the other amending section 2 of the Clayton Act . At first glance , the sections appear to be ...
... monopolistic and oppressive practices . H. R. 2820 is in two sections - the first amending section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the other amending section 2 of the Clayton Act . At first glance , the sections appear to be ...
29. lappuse
... monopolistic or oppressive practice in- volved which would come under section 5 of the Federal Trade Com- mission Act , which section 1 of the bill covers , and I was trying to give him an example of that . Let me say this now . What I ...
... monopolistic or oppressive practice in- volved which would come under section 5 of the Federal Trade Com- mission Act , which section 1 of the bill covers , and I was trying to give him an example of that . Let me say this now . What I ...
50. lappuse
... monopoly , provides , next to the Sherman Act itself , our strongest bulwark aaginst monopolistic practices . It deprives the monopolist and the would - be monopolist of their most potent weapon : price discrimination . As I construe it ...
... monopoly , provides , next to the Sherman Act itself , our strongest bulwark aaginst monopolistic practices . It deprives the monopolist and the would - be monopolist of their most potent weapon : price discrimination . As I construe it ...
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
amendment antitrust laws AUSTERN baker believe BERGER BERGSON BERNHARDT bill BLAIR buyers cement cents chain stores CHAIRMAN Clayton Act commerce Commission's committee companies competitor complete defense Congress cost create a monopoly customers dealers delivered prices discrimination in price discriminatory effect EMANUEL CELLER enactment equally low price fact faith to meet Federal Trade Commission freight absorption gasoline good-faith independent Indiana industry jobbers Judiciary KEATING legislation lessen competition lower price manufacturer McDONALD meet an equally meet competition meet the equally monopolistic monopoly opinion percent permit practices present price discrimination prohibition proviso purchasers question result retailers Robinson-Patman Act RUARK seller selling Senate services or facilities Sherman Act small business SPINGARN Staley Standard Oil Standard Oil Co statement statute Steel STEVENS subsection Supreme Court Supreme Court decision tend to create tion Trade Commission Act unfair unlawful price violation wholesalers WILLIS