Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

94T CONGRESS 1ST SESSION

H. R. 171

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 14, 1975

Ms. Anzug introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18 of the United States Code to prohibit the interception of certain communications unless all parties to the intercepted communication consent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 That section 2511 of title 18 of the United States Code is 4 amended by—

5

6

7

8

9

10

(1) striking out, in subsection (2) (c), "or one of the parties to such interception" and inserting in lieu thereof ", but only if all of the parties to the communication have given prior consent to such interception."; and

(2) striking out, in subsection 2 (d), "or where one

2

1

2

3

4

of the parties to the communication has given prior con

sent to such interception" and inserting in lieu thereof

", but only if all of the parties to the communication

have given prior consent to such interception,".

94TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION

H. R. 620

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 14, 1975

Mr. LONG of Maryland (for himself, Mr. HECHLER of West Virginia, Mr. RIEGLE, Mr. BROWN of California, Mrs. CHISHOLM, Mr. Moss, Mr. CHARLES WILSON of Texas, Mr. MITCHELL of Maryland, Mr. DIGGS, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. HELSTOSKI, Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois, Mr. HARRINGTON, and Mrs. MINK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18 of the United States Code to require the consent of all persons whose communications are intercepted under certain provisions relating to certain types of eavesdropping.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 That section 2511 (2) of title 18 of the United States Code 4 is amended by striking out paragraphs (c) and (d), and 5 inserting in lieu thereof the following:

6

"(c) It shall not be unlawful under this chapter for a

7 person to electronically record or otherwise intercept a wire

2

1

or oral communication where all parties to the communica2 tion have given prior consent to such interception unless 3 such communication is intercepted for the purpose of com4 mitting any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Con5 stitution or laws of the United States or of any State or for 6 the purpose of committing any other injurious act."

94TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION

H. R. 214

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 14, 1975

Mr. MOSHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To require in all cases court orders for the interception of communications by electronic and other devices, for the entering of any residence, for the opening of any mail, for the inspection or procurement of certain records, and for other purposes.

1

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 That this Act may be cited as the "Bill of Rights Procedures 4 Act of 1975".

5

6

FINDINGS AND PURPOSES

SEC. 2. (a) The Congress hereby finds and declares

7 that

8

9

(1) the rights of the people of the United States

under the Constitution of the United States are endan

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »