 An employer is not bound to indemnify his employee for losses suffered by the latter in consequence of the ordinary risks of the business in which he is employed, nor in consequence of the negligence of another person employed by the same employer in...  Biennial Report - 132. lappuseautors: California. Bureau of Labor Statistics - 1904Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu
 | New York (State). Commissioners of the Code - 1862 - 538 lapas
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business,1 unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee.1 1 Sherman v. Rochester and Syracuse RR, 17 NY, 156 ; Russell ». Hudson River RR, id., 136;... | |
 | 1868 - 894 lapas
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable, employee." The rule, as stated, was adhered to in Armstrong v. Catawissa Railroad, 13 Wright 186, but... | |
 | California - 1876 - 622 lapas
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee. § 1971. An employer must in all cases indemnify his employee for losses caused by the former's... | |
 | Edward P. Weeks - 1879 - 368 lapas
...negligence of anofher person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee. 1 To such cases the rule of respondeat superior does not apply, unless there has been want... | |
 | Thomas Beven - 1881 - 188 lapas
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, (a) unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employe." (b) Article 1,007: "An employer must in all cases indemnify his employe' for losses caused by his own... | |
 | 1888 - 1450 lapas
...negligence of another person employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless he has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employe.'" And: "But, gentlemen, if you find from the evidence that the defendant company was guilty of negligence... | |
 | 1906 - 1148 lapas
...of the negligence of another employed by the same employer in the same general business, unless tlio negligence causing the injury was committed in the...the employer has neglected to use ordinary care in tKe selection of the culpable employé, n master is not liable for injuries to a servant caused by... | |
 | 1918 - 1228 lapas
...of another person emnloyed by the snme emplover in the same general business, unless the négligence causing the injury was committed in the performance of a duty the employer owes by law to the employe1, * * * * provided, nevertheless, that the employer shall he liable for such injury when the... | |
 | F. I. Vassault - 1884 - 176 lapas
...causing the injury was caused in the performance of a duty the employer owes bj law to the employee, or unless the employer has neglected to use ordinary care in the selection of the culpable employee. The principal or employer shall, however, be responsible for injuries caused by the negligence... | |
| |
