Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

Page.

Bogen v. Leonard, 100 MS. Dec., 300.............

63

d Borden Ice-Cream Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co., 201 Fed. Rep., 510..
c Bowers v. Von Schmidt, 63 Fed. Rep., 572.....
**Boyd v. Janesville Hay Tool Co., 158 U. S., 260.
*Boynton v. Taggart, 40 App. D. C., 82........

79

254

282

122

d Boynton Co. v. Morris Co., 87 Fed. Rep., 225.
*Braadland. In re, 37 App. D. C., 602..

d Brammer v. Schroeder, 106 Fed. Rep., 918.
Braun v. Wahl, C. D., 1913, 78; 189 O. G., 254..
*Breitenbach v. Rosenberg, 37 App. D. C., 102.
d Bresnahan v. Tripp Co., 102 Fed. Rep., 899

*Brill v. Washington Railway & Electric Co., 30 App. D. C., 255..
**Brill v. Washington Railway & Electric Co., 215 U. S., 527..
Brinkman. Ex parte, 112 MS. Dec., 128.....

Brown v. Campbell, C. D., 1914, 37; 201 O. G., 903.
**Brown v. Davis, 116 U. S., 237.

**Brown v. Piper, 91 U. S., 37.

d Brown v. Stilwell Co., 57 Fed. Rep., 732

324

102

281

75

176

325

157

265

30

170

320

249

304

**Brown Chemical Company v. Meyer, 139 U. S., 540..

147, 369

c Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Klumpp, 126 Fed. Rep., 765...

249

c Buckingham v. Iron Co., 51 Fed. Rep., 236..

249

d Bundy v. Detroit, 94 Fed. Rep., 524....

243

c Burdett-Rowntree Mfg. Co. v. Standard Plunger Elevator Co., 196 Fed. Rep.,

43.....

d Burdett-Rowntree Mfg. Co. v. Standard Plunger Elevator Co., 197 Fed. Rep.,
743..

§Burke v. Partridge, 58 N. H., 351..

254

254
266, 293

323
164, 187

**Burr v. Duryee, 1 Wall., 533.

*Burson v. Vogel, 29 App. D. C., 388.

C.

d C., B. & Q. R. Co. v. United States, 211 Fed. Rep., 12.
*Cahn, Belt & Co. In re, 27 App. D. C., 173.............

[blocks in formation]

*Carmel Wine Co. v. California Winery, 38 App. D. C., 1.
**Carnegie Co. v. Cambria Co., 185 U. S., 403..
*Carroll v. Hallwood, 31 App. D. C., 165..............

[blocks in formation]

d Charles Boldt Co. v. Nivison, 194 Fed. Rep., 871.....

Charles, Prince de Löwenstein, C. D., 1904, 24; 108 O. G., 562.

d Chinnock v. Patterson Tel. Co., 112 Fed. Rep., 531..

[blocks in formation]

a Coca-Cola Co. v. Deacon Brown Bottling Co. et al., 200 Fed. Rep., 105.
a Coca-Cola Co. v. Nashville Syrup Co., 200 Fed. Rep., 153..

[blocks in formation]

Collins Co. In re, C. D., 1872, 251; 2 O. G., 617...

**Columbia Mill Co. v. Alcorn, 150 U. S., 460.....

d Columbia Motor Car Co. v. Duerr & Co., 184 Fed. Rep., 893..

d Comptograph Company v. Burroughs Adding Mach. Co., 183 Fed. Rep., 321.

c Conley v. Marum, 83 Fed. Rep., 309...

d Conley v. Marum, 84 Fed. Rep., 990..
**Consolidated Fruit-Jar v. Wright, 94 U. S., 92.......

d Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York, 157 Fed.
Rep., 677......

Page.

324

184

255

157

249

249

157

... 358, 362, 363

d Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York, 162 Fed. Rep., 892....

d Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Finley Rubber Tire Co., 116 Fed. Rep., 629.......

358, 362, 363

358, 362

c Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 147 Fed. Rep., 739....

358, 362

d Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 151 Fed. Rep., 237...

358, 362

c Consolidated Rubber Tire Company and The Rubber Tire Wheel Co., D. B.
Sullivan and Kenney & Sullivan v. Kokomo Co., D. C. Sparker, A. Lehman
and G. W. Landan, Circuit Court of Indiana, not reported. Appealed to the
C. C. A., seventh circuit, and dismissed...

**Consolidated Valve Co. v. Crosby Valve Co., 113 U. S., 157..
**Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 U. S., 414.

**Corbin Co. v. Eagle Co., 150 U. S., 38...

**Corn Planter Patent, The, 23 Wall., 181. *Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U. S., 351.

362

282

293

304, 305, 306 183, 319, 320, 323

99

63, 282 63

d Crown Cork & Seal Company v. Aluminum Stopper Company, 108 Fed. Rep., 845..

[blocks in formation]

c Davids Co., Thaddeus, v. Davids et al., 190 Fed. Rep., 285.. d Davids Co., Thaddeus, v. Davids et al., 178 Fed. Rep., 801..

d Davids Co., Thaddeus, v. Davids et al., 192 Fed. Rep., 915 **Davids Co., Thaddeus, v. Davids et al., 233 U. S., 461.. §Dell v. Oppenheimer, 9 Nebr., 457....

231

68

227

227,369

227, 369 83

c Diamond Match Co. v. Ruby Match Co., 127 Fed. Rep., 341..
**Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. and

Rubber Tire Wheel Co., 220 U. S., 428..

§Dixon v. Moyer, 4 Wash., 68....

**Dobson v. Lees, 137 U. S., 258.

137

254

222, 258, 291, 358, 363, 364

17

305

223

249

325

104

294

24, 25

180

240, 325

265

187

d Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Superior Drill Co., 115 Fed. Rep., 886...
d Drake Castle Pressed Steel Co. v. Brownell, 123 Fed. Rep., 86..
d Draper v. American Co., 161 Fed. Rep., 728..
*Drawbaugh. In re, 9 App. D. C., 219. .

**Du Bois v. Kirk, 158 U. S., 58..

Dudley & Co., U. H. Ex parte, C. D., 1913, 128; 191 O. G., 586.. **Dunbar v. Myers, 94 U. S., 187...

d Duncan v. Cincinnati Co., 171 Fed. Rep., 656..

d Duncan v. Stockham, 204 Fed. Rep., 781..

*Dunkley v. Beekhuis, 39 App. D. C., 494..

E.

d Eames v. Worcester, 123 Fed. Rep., 67....

c Eastern Dynamite Co. v. Keystone Powder Co., 164 Fed. Rep., 47.

c Eclipse Manufacturing Co. v. Adkins, 36 Fed. Rep., 554.

*Edna Smelting Co., 30 App. D. C., 487...

*Ehret v. Star Brewery Co., 31 App. D. C., 507.

c Eickemeyer Machine Co. v. Pearce, 10 Blatchf., 403.

d Eldred v. Kessler, 106 Fed. Rep., 509...

d Eldred v. Kirkland, 130 Fed. Rep., 342..

d Electric Controller Co. v. Westinghouse Co., 171 Fed. Rep., 83..

c Electric Machine Co. v. Morris, 156 Fed. Rep., 972.

Page. 238

331

249

108

102

335

359

359

223

272

d Electrical Accumulator Co. v. Brush Electric Co., 52 Fed. Rep., 130.. **Elgin National Watch Company v. Illinois Watch Case Co., 179 U.S., 665. 226,227, 373 d Expanded Metal Co. v. Board of Education of St. Louis, 111 Fed. Rep., 395. 339 **Expanded Metal Co. v. Bradford, 214 U. S., 366....

270

270

[blocks in formation]

272

280

d Fullerton Walnut Growers' Ass'n v. Anderson-Barngrover Mfg. Co., 166 Fed. Rep., 443.....

**Furrer v. Ferris, 145 U. S., 132...

G.

d Gaines v. Turner-Looker Co., 204 Fed. Rep., 553.

*Gaisman v. Gillett, 36 App. D. C., 440..

*Gallagher v. Hastings, 21 App. D. C., 88..

d Gannert v. Rupert, 127 Fed. Rep., 962..

*Gedge v. Cromwell, 19 App. D. C., 192.

c General Electric Co. v. Campbell, 137 Fed. Rep., 600..

d General Electric Co. v. International Co., 126 Fed. Rep., 755....

b General Electric Company v. Steinberger, 208 Fed. Rep., 699.

**Godfrey v. Eames, 1 Wall., 317..

Godillot. Ex parte, C. D., 1874, 120; 6 O. G., 642..

**Goodwin v. Fox, 129 U. S., 601....

92

183

18

92

17, 18

249

322

256

204

68

330

147

357, 358, 362 112

41, 42, 171 330, 331

223

70

269

269

5,6,7,8

292

75

238

**Goodyear's India Rubber Co. v. Goodyear Rubber Co., 128 U. S., 598..

d Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Rubber Tire Wheel Co., 116 Fed. Rep., 363...

*Goolman v. Hobart, 31 App. D. C., 286.

*Gordon v. Wentworth, 31 App. D. C., 150...

d Gorham Mfg. Co. v. Emery-Bird-Thayer Dry Goods Co., 104 Fed. Rep., 243.. d Gould & Eberhardt Co. v. Cincinnati Shaper Co., 194 Fed. Rep., 680...

c Graff, Washbourne & Dunn v. Webster et al., 189 Fed. Rep., 902. cGraham v. Manufacturing Co., 11 Fed. Rep., 138...

e Graham v. McCormick, 11 Fed. Rep., 859.

Gray v. Hale, C. D., 1871, 129..........

d Gray Telephone Pay Station Co. v. Baird Mfg. Co., 174 Fed. Rep., 417. Greenbaum v. Barker and Jeapes, 98 MS. Dec., 425..

d Grever v. Hoffman, 202 Fed. Rep., 923..

d Griswold v. Harker, 62 Fed. Rep., 389..

Page.

334, 335

330

187

d Guaranty Co. of North America v. Phenix Ins. Co., 124 Fed. Rep., 170...... *Gueniffet et al. v. Wictorsohn, 30 App. D. C., 432..

H.

*Hall & Ruckel v. Ingram, 28 App. D. C., 454.

c Hawes v. Antisdell, 2 Bann & A., 10. *Hawkins v. Ward, 38 App. D. C., 90.. *Hawley. In re, 26 App. D. C., 324.

Heinrich, Prinz von Preussen, 109 MS. Dec., 260. *Herbst Importing Co., 30 App. D. C., 297....

d Herman v. Youngstown Co., 191 Fed. Rep., 579. *Herz v. Lowenstein, 40 App. D. C., 277...........

c Herzog v. New York Telephone Co., 172 Fed. Rep., 425.. d Herzog v. New York Telephone Co., 176 Fed. Rep., 349.. d Hestonville v. McDuffee, 185 Fed. Rep., 798...

d Higgin Mfg. Co. v. Scherer, 100 Fed. Rep., 459.. *Higgins. In re, 40 App. D. C., 29.......

b Hildreth v. Auerbach, 200 Fed. Rep., 972..

Hires. Ex parte, C. D., 1912, 203; 180 O. G., 879.. **Hobbs v. Beach, 180 U. S., 383..

126

254

157

85

90

92

245

107, 108

51

51

51

249

142

88

126

223, 305, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323

c Hocke v. New York Central R. Co., 117 Fed. Rep., 320... **Hollister v. Benedict, etc., Co., 113 U. S., 59..

249

223

*Horine v. Wende, 29 App. D. C., 415..

d Horton Mfg. Co. v. White Lily Mfg. Co., 213 Fed. Rep., 471.

d Hotel etc. Co. v. Lorraine, 160 Fed. Rep., 467.

d Houser v. Starr, 203 Fed. Rep., 264....

**Howard v. Detroit Stove Works, 150 U. S., 164..

[blocks in formation]

a Hughes v. Alfred H. Smith & Co., 205 Fed. Rep., 302.

**Hump Hairpin Co. v. DeLong Hook and Eye Co., 39 App. D. C., 484.. **Hutchinson, Pierce & Co. v. Loewy, 217 U. S., 457..

227

153

356

I.

dIde v. Trorlicht, Duncker & Renard Carpet Co., 115 Fed. Rep., 137. **Imhaeuser v. Buerk, 101 U. S., 647. . . ..

269

335

*Independent Breweries Co., 39 App. D. C., 118.

92

d Industrial Mfg. Co. v. Willcox & Gibbs Sewing Machine Co., 112 Fed. Rep., 535....

270

b International Mausoleum Co. v. Sievert, 197 Fed. Rep., 936.
cInvestor Pub. Co. v. Dobinson, 72 Fed. Rep., 603.
**Iwan. In re, 17 App. D. C., 566. . . .

249

147

151

J.

dJackson Co. v. D'Arcy, 181 Fed. Rep., 340....

dJewell Filter Co., O. H., v. Jackson, 140 Fed. Rep., 340....

*Johns-Manville Co., H. W., v. American S. P. Co., 33 App. D. C., 224..

*Johnson v. Brandau, 32 App. D. C., 348..

cJohnson v. Johnston, 60 Fed. Rep., 618.

**Johnson v. Mueser, 212 U. S., 283..

309, 310

272, 339

185

152

219, 220

39

*Johnson Educator Co. v. Sylvanus Smith Co., 37 App. D. C., 107. c Jones v. Barker, 11 Fed. Rep., 600....

Jones v. Soulby, 33 Ch. D. 392..

K.

c Kaolatype Engraving Co. v. Hoke, 30 Fed. Rep., 444...

d Kalamazoo Ry. Supply Co. v. Duff Mfg. Co., 113 Fed. Rep., 264..

d Kellogg v. Dean, 182 Fed. Rep., 991.. **Kendall v. Windsor, 21 How., 322.

**Kessler v. Eldred, 206 U. S., 285...

**Keystone Co. v. Phoenix Co., 95 U.S., 274...

**Keystone Mfg Co. v. Adams, 151 U. S., 139. **Kimberly v. Arms, 129 U. S., 512..

c Kittle v. Hall, 29 Fed. Rep., 508.

Page.

153

266, 293 78

249

223

244

157

357, 359, 360, 361, 363, 364

242, 304, 305

223

280

51

266, 293

144

291

249

249

**Klein v. Russell, 19 Wall., 433.

**Krementz v. Cottle, 148 U. S., 556..

d Kuhlman Electric Co. v. General Electric Co., 147 Fed. Rep., 712.

c Kuhn v. Lock Stub Check Co., 157 Fed. Rep., 235.......

d Kuhn v. Lock Stub Check Co., 165 Fed. Rep., 445..

L.

**Lake Shore R. R. Co. v. Car Brake Co., 110 U. Š., 229.

d Lamb Co. v. Lamb Co., 120 Fed. Rep., 267.

d Lamson v. Hillman, 123 Fed. Rep., 416....

*Landespriv v. Hall & Ruckel, 36 App. D. C., 532.

d Lange v. McGuin, 177 Fed. Rep., 219...

c Lappin Brake-Shoe Co. v. Corning Brake-Shoe Co.; 94 Fed. Rep., 162
d Lappin Brake-Shoe Co. v. Corning Brake-Shoe Co., 99 Fed. Rep., 1004..
Latta v. Shawk, 1 Bond, 259....

Lawrence & Son v. Sharpless, 203 Fed. Rep., 762..

**Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Tennessee Manufacturing Co., 138 U. S., 537. Laxakola Co., The, C. D. 1902, 247; 100 O. G., 451..............

324

239, 322

240, 325

126

248, 249

249

249

335

77

373

126

d Layton Pure Food Co. v. Church & Dwight Co., 182 Fed. Rep., 24.

148

*Lecroix v. Tyberg, 33 App. D. C., 586..

164

**Leggett v. Avery, 101 U. S., 256..

305, 306

**Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. v. Mellon, 104 U. S., 112..

.293, 301

*Leonard v. Horton, 40 App. D. C., 22..

91

*Leschen & Sons R. Co., A. v. Broderick & Bascom Co., 36 App. D. C., 451...

148

d Lewis Blind Stitch Machine Co. v. Premium Mfg. Co., 163 Fed. Rep., 950... *Lotterhand v. Hanson, 23 App. D. C., 372....

[blocks in formation]

d Louden Machinery Co. v. Janesville Hay Tool Co., 148 Fed. Rep., 686.......

272

M.

*McBerty v. Cook, 16 App. D. C., 133.

**McCarty v. Railroad, 160 U. S., 110..

**McClain v. Ortmayer, 141 U. S., 419..

McCormick. Ex parte, C. D., 1904, 575; 113 O. G., 2708.

**McCormick v. Talcott et al., 20 How., 402..

*McIlhenny v. New Iberia Extract of Tabasco Pepper Co., 30 App. D. C., 337.

*McNeil. In re, 20 App. D. C., 294...

d Mahler v. Animarium Co., 111 Fed. Rep., 530..

158

239

223, 265

66

334

184

84, 85

249

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »