Conception by one employee, reduction to practice by another. Thomas 51 Decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirmed. *Warrington v. Combs. 189 Inventor not entitled to priority where he conceals invention till another 170 Only question in issue, patentability not considered. *Johnson v. Martin.. 162 Rusby v. Cross...... 64 *Sutton, Steele, and Steele v. Wentworth.. 210 Second interference after limit of appeal. *Sutton, Steele, and Steele v. 210 Proceedings in the Patent Office, effect of. d Wm. B. Scaife & Sons Co. v. 236 Process, unpatentable where it produces only a combination of known results. 113 Process and apparatus, separate patents for. d Century Electric Co. v. West- 267 Prosecution of application. Assignee of entire interest may exclude inventor, 86 Public-use proceedings, Commissioner of Patents has jurisdiction to order. R. 186 Reduction to practice, what constitutes. *Stewart v. Thomas.......... 180 Claims amended in view of, no further explanation necessary. Ex parte Combination of, when claims should be rejected. Ex parte McCollum.......... Reissue: Claims limited by specific structure of original patent. d Grand Rapids Not to be enlarged by including matter once intentionally omitted. 294 294 61 Res Adjudicata. Judgment, effect of as estoppel against second action on same 97 72367°-15-¤ Right to patent. Independent inventions, protection of each. dOttumwa Page. 327 Rules of the Patent Office as to construction, phrase having fixed meaning 310 S. Signature of application. Title as full name. Ex parte Karl, Prinz zu Löwen- 89 Suits for infringement, motion to strike out evidence. d Horton Mfg Co. v. White 285 Т. Terminology. The word "aggregation" defined. d Krell Auto Grand Piano Testimony: Abandonment, request for renewal prima facie evidence against. *Ewing, 246 127 111 127 205 353 223 367 Application to register name of individual, firm, etc., opposition statutory 146 Cancelation of trade-mark registration. Whiting-Adams Co. v. Rubber and 34 Section 13, Trade-Mark Act, 1905, applicable to registration under 161 107 Class of words which may be registered. Ex parte Boyce, Wheeler & Boyce 25 Section 5, Trade-Mark Statutes. *In re Gorham Manufacturing Com- 103 Section 12, Trade-Mark Act. 1905. *Ewing, Commissioner of Patents, 205 Sections 128 and 297, Judicial Code. **Street and Smith v. The Atlas 353 Trade-Mark Act, 1905. **Street and Smith v. The Atlas Manufacturing 353 Definition of the word "Class" as used in statute. *H. Wolf & Sons v. Lord 176 English hall-marks and insignia of Great Britain forbidden registration by 103 Trade-marks-Continued. Evidence, consideration by the Commissioner of Patents, of certified copies Foreign registration, effect of. d Rossmann v. Garnier..... Functional feature of device not proper subject for trade-mark registration. Goods of same descriptive properties. *H. Wolf & Sons v. Lord & Taylor. Damages not recoverable when infringer had no notice and when arti- What constitutes. d Rossmann v. Garnier. Interest in mark must be shown to entitle opposer to hearing. *Tim Judgment by default, priority awarded to applicant, but registration The word "Troy" for shirts and collars. *Tim & Co. v. Cluett, Pea- Renewal of registration, assertion of owner of continued use and title to Request for renewal not subject to examination as an original case. *Ewing, 183 205 205 91 Similarity of marks— **Thaddeus Davids Company v. Davids and Davids, trading as Davids 367 Color not claimed, difference immaterial to question. *Barclay and 97 Star upon which is superimposed a circle, for saws, refused registration upon Suits for infringement, judicial notice not taken of foreign uses and customs, 101 223 Trade-marks-Continued. Page. Surname not subject of exclusive use as common-law trade-mark. **Thaddeus Davids Company v. Davids and Davids, trading as Davids Manufacturing Company.... Ten-years clause In no way detracts from force of provision against immoral or scandalous Names of persons, firms, or corporations, descriptive and geographical "Abricotine," with the initials "P. G.," on a tabaret or shield infringed "Arab" for sardines, registrable, not a geographical term. Ex parte "Cumfy-Cut," for knit undershirts, registrable, not a descriptive word. *In re "Gold Bond," for clothes, refused registration on prior use. "Hydronon," for bituminous paint, refused registration on the word Use of mark on boxes containing goods, but not on goods themselves, not 183 Long-continued use resolves all doubts in favor of user. W. A. Law- Representation of cow, for cheese. W. A. Lawrence & Son v. The Validity of patent: V. Determination of on demurrer. d Krell Auto Grand Piano Co. of America v. Story & Clark Co. et al.. 246 Patentable combination. d Krell Auto Grand Piano Co. of America v. 246 CASES CITED. The opinion of the Attorney-General is indicated by a double dagger (†), the decisions of the State Courts by a section mark (§), of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia by the letter (a), of the United States District Courts by the letter (b), of the United States Circuit Courts by the letter (c), of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia by one star (*), of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals by the letter (d), and of the Supreme Court of the United States by two stars (**).] A. ** Adams v. Bellaire Stamping Co., 141 U. S., 539.. 223 d Adams Electric Ry. Co., v. Lindell Ry. Co., 77 Fed. Rep., 432.. 335 d American Fiber-Chamois Co. v. Buckskin Fiber Co., 72 Fed. Rep., 503.... *American Glue Co. In re, 27 App. D. C., 391.... 249 105 c American Grocery Co. v. Bennett, Sloan & Co., 68 Fed. Rep., 539.. 126 249 715. 249 81 d Anderson v. Collins, 122 Fed. Rep., 451... 281 d Anderson v. Potts, 108 Fed. Rep., 379. **Andrews et al. v. Hovey, 124 U. S., 694. 240 39 *Anti-Cori-Zine Chemical Co. In re, 34 App. D. C., 191.. d Armour Packing Co. v. United States, 153 Fed. Rep., 1. d Atlas Mfg. Co. et al. v. Street and Smith, 204 Fed. Rep., c Avery v. Case, 139 Fed. Rep., 878... c Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. A. Klipstein & Co., 125 Fed. Rep., 543... Baltzley v. Seeberger, C. D., 1905, 120; 115 O. G., 1329.. Barber & Co. Ex parte, 81 MS. Dec., 221 d Barnes Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Walworth Mfg. Co., 60 Fed. Rep., 605....... Barrett Mfg. Co. Ex parte, C. D., 1913, 150; 192 O. G., 518.. *Barrett Manufacturing Co. In re, 37 App. D. C., 111.. **Bate Refrigerating Company v. Sulzberger, 157 U. S., **Bates v. Coe, 98 U. S., 31..... *Battle Creek Sanitarium Co. v. Fuller, 30 App. D. C., 411. 270 33, 34, 91 78 292 176 126 63 292, 335 184, 185 136 249 335 220 188 21, 65, 67, 212, 214 17 350, 351 *Beals v. Finkenbiner, 12 App. D. C., 23.. d Beer v. Walbridge, 100 Fed. Rep., 465.. **Belding Mfg. Co. v. Challenge Corn Planter Co., 152 U. S., 100.. c Benjamin Menu Card Co. v. Rand, McNally & Co., 210 Fed. Rep., 285.. *Billings v. Field, 36 App. D. C., 16... *Blackford v. Wilder, 28 App. D. C., 535.. Bloxam v. Elsee, 1 Car. & P., 567.. **Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus, 210 U. S., 339. |