Cases Argued and Decided in the Supreme Court of the United StatesLEXIS Law Pub., 1991 First series, books 1-43, includes "Notes on U.S. reports" by Walter Malins Rose. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 82.
16. lappuse
... Congress had no au- thority to subject the railway to suit , we concluded that " the States sur- rendered a portion of their sover- eignty when they granted Congress the power to regulate commerce , " id . , at 191 , 12 L Ed 2d 233 , 84 ...
... Congress had no au- thority to subject the railway to suit , we concluded that " the States sur- rendered a portion of their sover- eignty when they granted Congress the power to regulate commerce , " id . , at 191 , 12 L Ed 2d 233 , 84 ...
38. lappuse
... Congress went on to enact a separate provision executing the requisite waiver of immunity , § 9607 ( g ) . However , with respect to the States , Congress made no such additional provision : the conclusion to be drawn is obvious ...
... Congress went on to enact a separate provision executing the requisite waiver of immunity , § 9607 ( g ) . However , with respect to the States , Congress made no such additional provision : the conclusion to be drawn is obvious ...
195. lappuse
... Congress must have followed ( though Congress could not have been aware of such require- ments when it acted ) in order to abrogate immunity . A genuine con- cern to identify Congress ' purpose would lead the Court to consider both the ...
... Congress must have followed ( though Congress could not have been aware of such require- ments when it acted ) in order to abrogate immunity . A genuine con- cern to identify Congress ' purpose would lead the Court to consider both the ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
42 USCS 96 S Ct ABA Committee abrogate action affirmed alleged amicus curiae annotation applied assets Attorney attorney's fees Auto-Cite award Blackmun BNA FEP Cas Brennan Brief CCH EPD ceding commissions CERCLA Civil Rights Act claim Commerce Clause concurring Congress constitutional contract counsel Court of Appeals criminal decision defendant denied discrimination dispute dissenting District Court due process Eleventh Amendment employees enacted enforce equal protection clause eral evidence express FACA Federal Constitution's federal court filed flag forfeiture Fourteenth Amendment held immunity infra intent interest issue judgment June 19 Jur 2d jury Justice L Ed 2d Labor liability ment opinion party person Petition for writ petitioner plaintiff prohibited provides question Railway Labor Act reason regulation reinsurance remanded remedy respondent rule Scalia sion Sixth Amendment sovereign immunity Stat statute statutory suit Supp supra Supreme Court tion Title VII Union violation writ of certiorari