Some Legal Phases of Corporate Financing, Reorganization, and RegulationMacmillan, 1917 - 389 lappuses |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
agreement American Tobacco Co amount antitrust applied appointed authorized bondholders bonds capital cash certificates Circuit Court claims Clayton Act combination Committee common stock competition contracts corporate bonds corporate mortgage counsel coupons Court of Appeals covenants creditor's bill creditors debt decision decree default defendant deposit district effect enforcement entitled equity federal courts Federal Trade Commission filed foreclose foreclosure suit indenture interest interstate commerce Interstate Commerce Commission issue Judge judgment judicial jurisdiction Justice lien matter ment monopolize mort mortgage mortgaged property mortgagor obligations operation opinion pany parties payment Plan of Reorganization pledged practice preferred stock present price discrimination principal proceedings provisions public service commissions purchase purpose question railroad company readjustment receiver receivership restraint of trade rule security holders Senate Sherman Act sinking fund specified statute stockholders Supreme Court tion Trust Company trustee United unlawful usually York York City Railway
Populāri fragmenti
294. lappuse - That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to lease or make a sale or contract for sale of goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies, or other commodities, whether patented or unpatented...
312. lappuse - To gather and compile information concerning, . and to investigate from time to time the organization, business, conduct, practices, and management of any corporation engaged in commerce, excepting banks and common carriers subject to the Act to regulate commerce, and its relation to other corporations and to individuals, associations, and partnerships.
292. lappuse - That this right shall not apply to contempts committed in the presence of the court or so near thereto as to interfere directly with the administration of justice...
292. lappuse - ... unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality...
287. lappuse - ... or to forbid or restrain individual members of such organizations from lawfully carrying out the legitimate objects thereof; nor shall such organizations, or the members thereof, be held or construed to be illegal combinations or conspiracies in restraint of trade, under the anti-trust laws.
291. lappuse - And no such restraining order or injunction shall prohibit any person or persons, whether singly or in concert, from terminating any relation of employment, or from ceasing to perform any work or labor, or from recommending, advising, or persuading others by peaceful means so to do...
313. lappuse - Act to regulate commerce or any class of them, or any of them, respectively, to file with the commission in such form as the commission may prescribe annual or special, or both annual and special, reports or answers in writing to specific questions...
271. lappuse - Whenever a final decree has been entered against any defendant corporation in any suit brought by the United States to prevent and restrain any violation of the antitrust Acts, to make investigation, upon its own initiative, of the manner in which the decree has been or is being carried out, and upon the application of the Attorney General it shall be its duty to make such investigation.
282. lappuse - That any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
285. lappuse - The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question or fact distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same partes or their privies; and even if the second suit is for a different cause of action, the right, question or fact once so determined must, as between the same parties or their privies, be taken as conclusively established, so long as the judgment...