Commentaries on Equity Pleadings, and the Incidents Thereof: According to the Practice of the Courts of Equity, of England and AmericaLittle, Brown, 1857 - 871 lappuses |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
abatement admitted alleged amendment answer Ante apply assets assignee Attorney-General averment Beames Beavan behalf Bill is brought Bill of Discovery Bill of Review Bill of Revivor cause cestuis que trust Chancery charge circumstances cited claim compel Cooper Court of Chancery Court of Equity creditors Cross Bill debt decree deed defendant demurrer denied distinct doctrine edit entitled executor facts file a Bill fraud Gilb ground Hare on Discov heir held Ibid interest Interpleader interrogatories Jeremy jurisdiction Jurisp justice Lefr legatees Lord Cottenham Lord Eldon Lord Hardwicke Lord Redesdale Madd matter misjoinder Mitf mortgage mortgagor multifariousness Mylne & Craig nature necessary parties objection original Bill overruled Paige plaintiff pleaded Post prayed proceedings proper parties question relief rule Russ statute Story on Eq subject-matter sufficient supplemental Bill taken tenant testator tion trust Vern Wigram Younge & Coll
Populāri fragmenti
798. lappuse - But after replication filed the plaintiff shall not be permitted to withdraw it and to amend his bill, except upon a special order of a judge of the court, upon motion or petition, after due notice to the other party, and upon proof by affidavit that the same is not made for the purpose of vexation or delay, or that the matter of the proposed amendment is material, and could not with reasonable diligence have been sooner introduced into the bill...
174. lappuse - In all cases in which the plaintiff has a joint and several demand against several persons, either as principals or sureties, it shall not be necessary to bring before the Court, as parties to a suit concerning such demand, all the persons liable thereto ; but the plaintiff may proceed against one or more of the persons severally liable.
4. lappuse - Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Circuit Court of the United States for the First Circuit, from 1812 to 1815.
784. lappuse - Every defendant may swear to his answer before any justice or judge of any court of the United States, or before any commissioner appointed by any circuit court to take testimony or depositions, or before any master in chancery appointed by any circuit court, or before any judge of any court of a State or Territory, or before any notary public.
736. lappuse - To the end, therefore, that the said defendants may, if they can, show why your orator should not have the relief hereby prayed, and may, upon their several and respective corporal oaths...
42. lappuse - Every bill shall contain the signature of counsel annexed to it, which shall be considered as an affirmation on his part that, upon the instructions given to him, and the case laid before him. there is good ground for the suit, in the manner in which it is framed.
805. lappuse - ... or qualifying or altering the original statements, except by special leave of the court or of a judge thereof, upon motion and cause shown after due notice to the adverse party, supported, if required, by affidavit. And in every case where leave is so granted, the court or the judge granting the same may, in his discretion, require that the same be separately engrossed, and added as a distinct amendment to the original answer, so as to be distinguishable therefrom.
798. lappuse - ... or that the matter of the proposed amendment is material, and could not with reasonable diligence have been sooner introduced into the bill, and upon the plaintiff's submitting to such other terms as may be imposed by the judge for speeding the cause.
797. lappuse - The plaintiff shall be at liberty, as a matter of course, and without payment of costs, to amend his bill, in any matters whatsoever, before any copy has been taken out of the clerk's office, and in any small matters afterwards, such as...
70. lappuse - By this means, the court is enabled to make a complete decree between the parties, to prevent future litigation by taking away the necessity of a multiplicity of suits...