Decisions of the Courts and the Patent Office as to the Validity and Scope of the Bell Patents - 393 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 89.
85. lappuse
... questions in- volved , the question of title and the question of infringement , is , in our judgment , so clear that we cannot deny the complainants the re- lief to which they are actually entitled ; and the injunction is there- fore ...
... questions in- volved , the question of title and the question of infringement , is , in our judgment , so clear that we cannot deny the complainants the re- lief to which they are actually entitled ; and the injunction is there- fore ...
108. lappuse
... question whether you are entitled to file an answer . Mr. STORROW . We make no objection . The COURT . But the preliminary injunction ought to go ; and then by the time we hear the case , the question whether there is any patent or not ...
... question whether you are entitled to file an answer . Mr. STORROW . We make no objection . The COURT . But the preliminary injunction ought to go ; and then by the time we hear the case , the question whether there is any patent or not ...
187. lappuse
... question is more embarrassing , and that is , whether a preliminary injunction , under the circumstances of this case , would be proper . These defendants engaged in this enterprise in the summer or fall of 1885. This suit was brought ...
... question is more embarrassing , and that is , whether a preliminary injunction , under the circumstances of this case , would be proper . These defendants engaged in this enterprise in the summer or fall of 1885. This suit was brought ...
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acoustic acoustic telegraphy Alexander Graham Bell alleged American Bell Telephone apparatus application armature Bell Company Bell Telephone Company Bell's patent bill caveat Circuit Court Commissioner complainants construction counsel Cushman decision defendants described device diaphragm discovery Dolbear Dowd Drawbaugh Edison electric current electrical undulations electro-magnet Elisha Gray equity evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiners-in-Chief Exhibit experiments fact February 14 filed fraud granted Gray Gray's heard human voice infringement injunction instruments interference proceedings invention inventor issue G January letters patent licensee corporation magnet make-and-break March matter McDonough means membrane ment method Meucci motion Ohio operation opinion parties Patent Office petition practice present prior proceedings produced proof question reason receiver reduction to practice Reis reproduced says scire facias sounds speaking telephone speaking-telephone specification suit talking machine tele Telegraph Company testifies testimony tion tones transmission transmitting articulate speech transmitting speech undulatory current United vibrations Western Union wire witnesses