Clark, F. W., General Freight Agent of Seaboard Air Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Company, PAGE. . 649 223 613 128 East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad Company et al., Little Rock & Memphis Railroad Company v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railway Company et al., James & Abbott v. Elvey, Charles v. Illinois Central Railroad Company 1 225 652 111 252 Georgia Railroad Company, William H. Heard v. Harris, James A. v. H. R. Duval, Receiver etc. Illinois Central Railroad Company, Charles Elvey v. 473 . 128 . 111 In the matter of the Application of F. W. Clark, General Freight and Passenger Agent of Seaboard Air Line 649 In the matter of the Application of Petitioner for subpœnas duces tecum In the matter of the Investigation of the Acts and In the matter of Rice, Robinson & Witherop v. Western James & Abbott v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia 186 89 87 19 225 473 Leggett, Francis H. & Co. v. New York Central & Hud- 1 Little Rock & Memphis Railroad Company v. East Mattingly, Bennet D. v. Pennsylvania Company. Michigan Central Railroad Company, Frederick A. 223 . 592 Myers, Milton L., Survivor, etc. v. Pennsylvania Company et al. Newport News & Mississippi Valley Company et al., PAGE. 473 New Orleans Cotton Exchange v. Cincinnati, New New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company et al., F. B. Thurber et al. v.; Thomas L. Greene v.; New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company et al., New York Produce Exchange v. New York Produce Exchange v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company et al. Pankey, J. B. v. Richmond & Danville Railroad Com- pany et al. 264 264 Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Worcester Excursion Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Company v. Rawson, William L. v. Newport News & Mississippi Val- Richmond & Danville Railroad Company et al., J. B. Pankey v. PAGE. . 658 512 Sanger, Major J. P. v. Southern Pacific Company et al. 134 Subpoenas duces tecum, in the matter of the application of Petitioner for 613 186 Tariffs and Classifications of the Atlanta & West Point 19 Third Annual Report of the Interstate Commerce Commission 289 Thurber, F. B. et al. v. New York Central & Hudson 473 Union Pacific Railway Company et al., Lincoln Board of Western New York & Pennsylvania Railroad Company White, Frederick A. v. Michigan Central Railroad Com- Worcester Excursion Car Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad 221 87 281 577 TABLE OF CASES CITED. PAGE. Boston & Albany Railroad Company v. Boston & Low- 183 604 557, 560 557, 559 84, Business Men's Association of the State of Minnesota v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company, 2 I. C. C. R. 52, 67, Burton Stock Car Company v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company et al., 1 I. C. C. R. 140, . 582, 586 California v. Pacific Railroad Company, 127 U. S. 1, 604 Chicago & Alton Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 1 I. C. C. R. 86, Coe v. Errol, 116 U. S. 517, Crews v. Richmond & Danville Railroad Company, 1 I. Crocker v. Railroad Co., 24 Conn. 249, Detroit Board of Trade v. Grand Trunk Railway et al., 2 I. C. C. R. 315, 321, 325, 5, 18 632 603 Evans & Reed v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Company, 1 I. C. C. R. 336, |