Journal of the Patent Office Society, 64. sējumsPatent Office Society., 1982 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 70.
353. lappuse
... filed an application for a patent and in April 1958 , sold 50,000 of the cups to a customer who used them in vending machines during April and May of 1958. In June 1958 , Edwards invented an improved cup , on which a patent application ...
... filed an application for a patent and in April 1958 , sold 50,000 of the cups to a customer who used them in vending machines during April and May of 1958. In June 1958 , Edwards invented an improved cup , on which a patent application ...
656. lappuse
... filed in the United States ... shall have the same effect , as to such invention , as though filed on the date of the prior application . . . " subject to certain limitations recited in the statute . This provision allows an application ...
... filed in the United States ... shall have the same effect , as to such invention , as though filed on the date of the prior application . . . " subject to certain limitations recited in the statute . This provision allows an application ...
. lappuse
... filed if there has been a time lapse of more than six months or so between the respective filing dates . Thus , we have a very harsh rule , or the United States Patent and Trademark Office rule interpretation , as cur- rently applied to ...
... filed if there has been a time lapse of more than six months or so between the respective filing dates . Thus , we have a very harsh rule , or the United States Patent and Trademark Office rule interpretation , as cur- rently applied to ...
Saturs
P J Pat Federico And His Works | 2 |
There Is No Such Thing As | 39 |
PTO Practice G M v Toyota | 47 |
Autortiesības | |
25 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
Alton D amended application for patent authority award best mode Board of Appeals Board of Patent CAFC CCPA Circuit Commission Commissioner Commissioner's Corp Court of Appeals damages decision determined disclosed disclosure district court effect entitled examiner exclusion order existing 35 USC Federal filing date first-to-file granted infringement inter interest interference practice interference proceeding invalid inventor involved JPOS Judge jurisdiction Lanham Act legislative license licensor ment Patent and Trademark patent application patent claims Patent Examining Patent Interferences patent law Patent Office Society patentable subject matter plaintiff prior art prior invention procedures proposed provides reduction to practice registration reissue rejection result right of priority rulemaking Section 102 Section 337 specification Statement statute statutory subject matter Supp supra note Supreme Court third party tion Trademark Office U.S. patent United States Code United States Patent USITC Pub USPQ validity