Air Law Review, 5. sējumsBoard of New York University Air Law Review, 1934 Includes "Bibliographical section". |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 25.
194. lappuse
... Armstrong , who had received a patent in 1914,5 and who was not a party to the proceeding , was the patentee . In 1924 DeForest applied to the Commissioner of Patents for letters patent on an article involving the " feed - back ...
... Armstrong , who had received a patent in 1914,5 and who was not a party to the proceeding , was the patentee . In 1924 DeForest applied to the Commissioner of Patents for letters patent on an article involving the " feed - back ...
195. lappuse
... Armstrong and his assignees for the purpose of having the Armstrong patent declared void . The action was brought under section 4918 of the Re- vised Statutes , which provides , " Whenever there are interfering patents , any person ...
... Armstrong and his assignees for the purpose of having the Armstrong patent declared void . The action was brought under section 4918 of the Re- vised Statutes , which provides , " Whenever there are interfering patents , any person ...
196. lappuse
... Armstrong was the prior inventor was upheld.24 A summary of the history of the " feed - back " circuit shows the following facts : 1. Armstrong was granted a patent on the invention in 1914.25 2. In cases in which Armstrong has been the ...
... Armstrong was the prior inventor was upheld.24 A summary of the history of the " feed - back " circuit shows the following facts : 1. Armstrong was granted a patent on the invention in 1914.25 2. In cases in which Armstrong has been the ...
Saturs
LEGAL QUESTIONS CONCERNING AERODROMES ON THE OPEN SEA USUALLY | 11 |
AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL OF THE VOL 1 No 1 JAN 1934 | 28 |
323 | 35 |
18 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
accident adopted aeronautical law aeroplane Air Commerce Air Commerce Act Air Law Review air mail air transport airplane airport airspace airworthiness amendment American Bar Association application April Armstrong authority aviation broadcasting certificate circuit Civil Air Fleet civil aircraft committee common carrier communication companies conferences Congress constitute contract Corporation Court of Appeals damage decision declared defendant DeForest delegation facilities fact Federal Radio Commission flight flying held interest interference interference proceeding International Interstate Commerce Interstate Commerce Commission Intro January Journal of Air jurisdiction legislation legislature liability N. Y. Supp negligence October operation owner passenger patent person plaintiff plane presumption provides question Radio Act regenerative circuit regulations res adjudicata res ipsa loquitur Reviews and Notices rule STAT station license statute Supra note Supreme Court TELEGRAPH telephone tion torts trespass United vote Warsaw Convention York