Cato Supreme Court Review, 2002-2003, 2001-2002. sējumi

Pirmais vāks
James L. Swanson
Cato Institute, 2003. gada 25. okt. - 292 lappuses
Published every September in celebration of Constitution Day, the Cato Supreme Court Review brings together leading legal scholars to analyze the most important cases of the Court's most recent term. It is the first scholarly review to appear after the term's end and the only on to critique the court from a Madisonian perspective.

No grāmatas satura

 

Atlasītās lappuses

Saturs

Introduction
1
On Constitutionalism
7
Lawrence v Texas
21
Principle and Policy in Public University Admissions
43
Nike v Kasky and the Definition of Commercial Speech
63
Cross Burning Symbolic Speech and the First Amendment
81
A Missed Opportunity for the Supreme Court to Clarify Application of First Amendment Law to Publicly Funded Expressive Institutions
105
Eldred v Ashcroft and the Logic of a Written Constitution
131
The Conservative Split on Punitive Damages
159
Searching for Corruption in All the Wrong Places
187
Much Ado about Nothing?
223
IOLTA Brown v Legal Foundation of Washington and the Taking of Property without the Payment of Compensation
245
October Term 2003
271
Contributors
283
Cato Institute
292
Autortiesības

Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes

American Library Association applied argued argument authority Breyer Buckley California campaign finance candidate Cato Cato Institute Chief Justice CIPA client commercial speech compelling concurring Congress congressional constitutionality contributions Copyright Clause copyright terms corporate corruption Court’s cross burning CTEA decision discrimination dissenting doctrine Due Process Clause existing copyrights expression Farm Federal Election Federal Election Commission filtering Footnote Four Fourteenth Amendment funds Ginsburg government’s Grutter individual interest Internet access IOLTA accounts issue judicial justify Kasky Law School lawyers Legal legislative legislatures liberty limited ment Nike Nike’s O’Connor one’s opinion plurality political principle prohibited promote the Progress protected public forum punitive damage awards punitive damages question racial reason regulation Rehnquist requires restrictions Roger Pilon rule S.Ct Scalia scrutiny Souter sovereign immunity state’s statute substantive Supreme Court Thomas tion U.S. Supreme Court unconstitutional United University violated Virginia Washington

Par autoru (2003)

James L. Swanson is a former senior fellow in constitutional studies and former editor-in-chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review. A graduate of the University of Chicago and the UCLA School of Law, he was a member of the law review and recipient of a moot court distinguished advocate award. He served as assistant to Chairman Susan Liebeler at the U.S. International Trade Commission, clerked for Douglas H. Ginsburg, chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and was a special assistant in the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice, where he worked on Supreme Court nominations. He is the founding and current editor of the First Amendment Law Handbook (Westgroup).

Bibliogrāfiskā informācija

NosaukumsCato Supreme Court Review, 2002-2003, 2001-2002. sējumi
Cato Supreme Court review
RedaktorsJames L. Swanson
IzdevējsCato Institute, 2003
ISBN1933995726, 9781933995724
Apjoms292 lappuses
  
Eksportēt avotuBiBTeX EndNote RefMan