| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1963 - 316 lapas
...stifling of competition. A vertical territorial limitation may or may not have that purpose or effect. We do not know enough of the economic and business...company has for breaking into or staying in business (cf. Brown Shoe, supra, at 330; United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F. Supp. 545, 560-561,... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1963 - 290 lapas
...stifling of competition. A vertical territorial limitation may or may not have that purpose or effect. We do not know enough of the economic and business...company has for breaking into or staying in business (cf. Brown Shoe, supra, at 330; United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F. Supp. 545, 560-561,... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1965 - 1170 lapas
...customers to reach a conclusion on the bare hones of the documentary evidence before us." * ******* "We do not know enough of the economic and business...protections against aggressive competitors or the only praticable means a small company has for breaking into or staying in business * * • and within the... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1968 - 640 lapas
...interbrand competition, some limitations on intrabrand competition may be necessary. Restraints of this type "may be allowable protections against aggressive competitors...company has for breaking into or staying in business (cf. Brown Shoe [v. United States, 370 US 294], at 330; United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp.,... | |
| |