Comprehensive Regulatory Reform Act of 1995: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 343 ... February 22 and 24, 1995, 4. sējumsUnited States, United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts U.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 265 lappuses |
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
addition Administrative agency agency action agency's allow alternatives amended Answer apply approach appropriate authority basis believe benefits bill Committee complete concerns Conference Congress consider consideration contains cost-benefit analysis costs courts decision decisional criteria designed determination economic effect environmental example executive order existing federal final give going House identified impact important imposed interpretation involved issues judicial review kind language legislation limited look major rule matter means ment million oversight particular perform persons petition practice prepared President presidential principles problem procedures promulgated proposed provisions question reasonable Recommendation regulations regulatory analysis regulatory reform requirements response result risk assessment rulemaking safety Senator GRASSLEY significant specific standards statement statute statutory subchapter suggest testimony things tion United
Populāri fragmenti
123. lappuse - ... means the whole or a part of an agency statement of general or particular applicability and future effect designed to implement, interpret, or prescribe law or policy...
123. lappuse - ... agency and includes the approval or prescription for the future of rates, wages, corporate or financial structures or reorganizations thereof, prices, facilities, appliances, services or allowances therefor or of valuations, costs, or accounting, or practices bearing on any of the foregoing; (5) "rule making...
80. lappuse - Order is intended only to improve the internal management of the Federal government, and is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers or any person.
122. lappuse - For the purpose of this chapter (1) "agency" means each authority of the Government of the United States, whether or not it is within or subject to review by another agency, but does not include (A) the Congress; (B) the courts of the United States; (C) the governments of the territories or possessions of the United States...
199. lappuse - All appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case may be, to the procedure relating to a resolution with respect to a reorganization plan shall be decided without debate.
32. lappuse - The problem is best seen in a twofold aspect, requiring us to evaluate both the fitness of the issues for judicial decision and the hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration.
15. lappuse - ... hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be A. arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; B. contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; C. in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; D.
166. lappuse - States, not exceeding $10,000 in amount, founded either upon the Constitution, or any Act of Congress, or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any express or implied contract with the United States, or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort.
38. lappuse - The procedures to assure this opportunity are not required by law, however, when rules are promulgated in relation to "public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts." These types of rules may nevertheless bear heavily upon nongovernmental interests. Exempting them from generally applicable procedural requirements is unwise. The present law should therefore be amended to discontinue the exemptions to strengthen procedures that will make for fair, informed exercise of rulemaking authority...
23. lappuse - ... because it comes from a source with an interest in the outcome of the rulemaking. Agencies should reduce the impact of bias by: (i) Consulting, whenever possible, multiple sources of information in preparing regulatory analysis documents; (ii) Carefully citing in regulatory analysis documents all information upon which the analysis draws, and making the information available for public scrutiny at convenient times and places; (iii) Actively soliciting comment and criticism from acknowledged experts...