Comprehensive Regulatory Reform Act of 1995: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 343 ... February 22 and 24, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 265 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 100.
4. lappuse
... standards by which the costs and benefits of regulations are to be compared , and pro- vides for judicial review of actions by the Government . The bill applies not only to new regulations as they are formu- lated , but also to existing ...
... standards by which the costs and benefits of regulations are to be compared , and pro- vides for judicial review of actions by the Government . The bill applies not only to new regulations as they are formu- lated , but also to existing ...
8. lappuse
... standard , having stated in one of our recommendations that courts should do what Chevron suggests . So we think that to a great ex- tent section 628 is broadly consistent with our recommendation . I would point out that our ...
... standard , having stated in one of our recommendations that courts should do what Chevron suggests . So we think that to a great ex- tent section 628 is broadly consistent with our recommendation . I would point out that our ...
9. lappuse
... standards in terms of statutory interpretation . I don't know which one gov- erns ; I don't know what either one means . It has 11 different com- mands on cost / benefit analysis . Saying it more than once doesn't make it clearer . It ...
... standards in terms of statutory interpretation . I don't know which one gov- erns ; I don't know what either one means . It has 11 different com- mands on cost / benefit analysis . Saying it more than once doesn't make it clearer . It ...
11. lappuse
... standard articulated in Chevron USA v . NRDC , 467 U.S. 837 ( 1984 ) . The bill should clarify whether it intends to codify that standard . We also suggest that section 628 ( c ) ( 1 ) ( C ) be revised , because it introduces a somewhat ...
... standard articulated in Chevron USA v . NRDC , 467 U.S. 837 ( 1984 ) . The bill should clarify whether it intends to codify that standard . We also suggest that section 628 ( c ) ( 1 ) ( C ) be revised , because it introduces a somewhat ...
13. lappuse
... standards for public disclosure of information relating to the oversight process . Recommendation 88-9 is attached and we offer it for the Committee's consideration . ( We would note that the currently operative executive order , E.O. ...
... standards for public disclosure of information relating to the oversight process . Recommendation 88-9 is attached and we offer it for the Committee's consideration . ( We would note that the currently operative executive order , E.O. ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
$50 million Administrative Conference Administrative Procedure Act agency action agency rulemaking agency rules agency's alternatives amended analytical requirements answer apply benefits to society bill BREGER Chevron Clean Air Act Committee Conference Recommendation CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Congressional consent judgment consider cost-benefit analysis costs and benefits deadline decision decisional criteria determination economic effect emissions ensure environmental executive order existing rules final rule Gellhorn going identified important imposed interpretation issues judicial review KATZEN latory legislative veto litigation major rule mandate ment negotiated rulemaking oversight petition President presidential review problem promulgated proposed rule question Reagan regu regulatory analysis documents regulatory flexibility Regulatory Flexibility Act regulatory impact require agencies review of agency reviewing court risk assessment rulemaking process safety Section 625 Senator GRASSLEY Senator THURMOND significant specific standards statute statutory subchapter Subcommittee substantial testimony tion Tucker Act
Populāri fragmenti
123. lappuse - ... means the whole or a part of an agency statement of general or particular applicability and future effect designed to implement, interpret, or prescribe law or policy...
123. lappuse - ... agency and includes the approval or prescription for the future of rates, wages, corporate or financial structures or reorganizations thereof, prices, facilities, appliances, services or allowances therefor or of valuations, costs, or accounting, or practices bearing on any of the foregoing; (5) "rule making...
80. lappuse - Order is intended only to improve the internal management of the Federal government, and is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers or any person.
122. lappuse - For the purpose of this chapter (1) "agency" means each authority of the Government of the United States, whether or not it is within or subject to review by another agency, but does not include (A) the Congress; (B) the courts of the United States; (C) the governments of the territories or possessions of the United States...
199. lappuse - All appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case may be, to the procedure relating to a resolution with respect to a reorganization plan shall be decided without debate.
32. lappuse - The problem is best seen in a twofold aspect, requiring us to evaluate both the fitness of the issues for judicial decision and the hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration.
15. lappuse - ... hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be A. arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; B. contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; C. in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; D.
166. lappuse - States, not exceeding $10,000 in amount, founded either upon the Constitution, or any Act of Congress, or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any express or implied contract with the United States, or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort.
38. lappuse - The procedures to assure this opportunity are not required by law, however, when rules are promulgated in relation to "public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts." These types of rules may nevertheless bear heavily upon nongovernmental interests. Exempting them from generally applicable procedural requirements is unwise. The present law should therefore be amended to discontinue the exemptions to strengthen procedures that will make for fair, informed exercise of rulemaking authority...
23. lappuse - ... because it comes from a source with an interest in the outcome of the rulemaking. Agencies should reduce the impact of bias by: (i) Consulting, whenever possible, multiple sources of information in preparing regulatory analysis documents; (ii) Carefully citing in regulatory analysis documents all information upon which the analysis draws, and making the information available for public scrutiny at convenient times and places; (iii) Actively soliciting comment and criticism from acknowledged experts...