Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act of 1988: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 1213, H.R. 1438, H.R. 2605, H.R. 3889, and H.R. 4257 ... April 28, June 16, and August 11, 1988, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1989 - 747 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
21. lappuse
... Supreme Court has been clear on obscenity . The defenders of pornography have used the issue of free speech and the First Amendment as a smoke screen to cloud the issue . This would be an accurate strategy if the Supreme Court had not ...
... Supreme Court has been clear on obscenity . The defenders of pornography have used the issue of free speech and the First Amendment as a smoke screen to cloud the issue . This would be an accurate strategy if the Supreme Court had not ...
25. lappuse
... Supreme Court has been clear and decisive . Obscenity is not , nor ever has been , protected by the First Amendment ... courts are helping define community standards and state law makers are working feverishly to strengthen their state ...
... Supreme Court has been clear and decisive . Obscenity is not , nor ever has been , protected by the First Amendment ... courts are helping define community standards and state law makers are working feverishly to strengthen their state ...
35. lappuse
... Supreme Court has established that obscene material is not protected by the First Amendment ( Roth vs. United States , 1957 ) ; and that material can be judged as a whole to determine whether it lacks serious literary , artistic ...
... Supreme Court has established that obscene material is not protected by the First Amendment ( Roth vs. United States , 1957 ) ; and that material can be judged as a whole to determine whether it lacks serious literary , artistic ...
42. lappuse
... Supreme Court of the United States in 1973 established basic guidelines for determing " what is obscene " , and , PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ( U.S.A. ) · 2 WHEREAS , the 42.
... Supreme Court of the United States in 1973 established basic guidelines for determing " what is obscene " , and , PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ( U.S.A. ) · 2 WHEREAS , the 42.
43. lappuse
... Supreme Court of the United States has traditionally held that obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment and that obscenity is not protected expression ; and , WHEREAS , there are existing federal and state laws to stem the ...
... Supreme Court of the United States has traditionally held that obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment and that obscenity is not protected expression ; and , WHEREAS , there are existing federal and state laws to stem the ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
abuse adult Amendment American Attorney General's Commission bill BRUCE RITTER cable cable television Chairman child pornography Child Protection Church civil forfeiture Commission on Pornography committee concern Congress constitutional constitutionally criminal customs laws dial-a-porn distribution distributors effect evidence exploitation federal films foreign commerce forfeited forfeiture provisions hardcore pornography harm HUGHES illegal indecent interstate or foreign involved issue law enforcement legally obscene legislation magazines matter MCCOLLUM minor models obscene material Obscenity Enforcement Act obscenity laws offense penalties performers person Postal Service problem produced prohibit prosecution prostitution Protection and Obscenity rape rebuttable presumption regulation Roush seizure sexual violence sexually explicit conduct sexually explicit materials sexually oriented SEXUALLY ORIENTED ADVERTISEMENTS speech statement statute subsection supra note Supreme Court television testimony title 18 transported U.S. Attorneys United United States attorney United States Code victims violation visual depiction William Margold women