Analytical Methods and Approaches for Water Resources Project PlanningNational Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Ocean Studies Board, Water Science and Technology Board, Committee to Assess the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Methods of Analysis and Peer Review for Water Resources Project Planning, Panel on Methods and Techniques of Project Analysis National Academies Press, 2004. gada 30. aug. - 165 lappuses Analytical Methods and Approaches for Water Resources Project Planningis part of a larger study that was conducted in response to a request from the U.S. Congress in the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 for the National Academy of Sciences to review the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's peer review methods and analytical approaches. This report reviews the Corps' analytical procedures and planning methods, largely in the context of the federal Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies, also known as the Principles and Guidelines or "P and G" (P&G), as well as the Corps' Planning Guidance Notebook (PGN). |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 42.
... issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community ...
... issues remain important in today's national water resources planning context. Our panel's task was to review Corps planning techniques as embodied in the federal Principles and Guidelines and in the Corps own planning guidance. In our ...
... .............................49 Corps Missions and Methods............................................53 Other Issues.......................................................................67 Commentary..........................
... issues relevant to these methods. FEDERAL LEGISLATION, GUIDANCE, AND ORGANIZATIONS Policies and Legislation The contemporary setting of U.S. water management features numerous well-informed and active stakeholders with water management ...
... issues, but the P&G does not incorporate these types of considerations into the planning calculus. The Corps naturally looks to credible sources to guide its planning decisions. This is especially the case given that the agency's ...
Saturs
1 | |
11 | |
17 | |
3 Assessing Benefits and Costs of Corps Projects | 38 |
4 Stakeholder Participation | 73 |
5 Engineering | 87 |
6 A New National Water Management Framework | 98 |
7 Revising Corps of Engineers Planning Studies | 109 |
Appendixes | 127 |
Appendix A Water Resources Development Act 2000 Public Law No 106541 of the 106th Congress | 129 |
Appendix B Corps Divisions and Districts | 132 |
Appendix C Office of Management and Budgets Guidance on Nonmarket Valuation Techniques | 134 |
Appendix D Analysis of Nonstructural Flood Damage Reduction | 136 |
Appendix E Army Corps of Engineers Planning Center of Expertise | 138 |
Appendix F Rosters | 142 |
Appendix G Biographical Information of Panel Members and Staff | 147 |