Analytical Methods and Approaches for Water Resources Project PlanningNational Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Ocean Studies Board, Water Science and Technology Board, Committee to Assess the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Methods of Analysis and Peer Review for Water Resources Project Planning, Panel on Methods and Techniques of Project Analysis National Academies Press, 2004. gada 30. aug. - 165 lappuses Analytical Methods and Approaches for Water Resources Project Planningis part of a larger study that was conducted in response to a request from the U.S. Congress in the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 for the National Academy of Sciences to review the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's peer review methods and analytical approaches. This report reviews the Corps' analytical procedures and planning methods, largely in the context of the federal Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies, also known as the Principles and Guidelines or "P and G" (P&G), as well as the Corps' Planning Guidance Notebook (PGN). |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 52.
... importance of the U.S. Congress and the sitting administration in directing Corps programs, many of our recommendations ... important crossroads. The nation, through the administration and Congress, must help the agency chart its way for ...
... , NRC, 1999). Although specific planning techniques and larger national priorities shifted through the course of these studies, several overarching themes stand out: the importance of the executive and congressional ix Preface.
... importance of financial and economic decision criteria in planning, and the importance of sound technical bases of economic and engineering evaluation. These issues remain important in today's national water resources planning context ...
... with support from our elected leadersto meet these important challenges. Gregory B. Baecher Chairman EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................ 1 1 CORPS OF ENGINEERS MISSIONS, PROJECTS, AND xii Preface.
... important given that the Corps' future work program is likely to center upon more efficient management of existing infrastructurewhich will entail more trade-off decisions and less new project construction. This is not to say that the ...
Saturs
1 | |
11 | |
17 | |
3 Assessing Benefits and Costs of Corps Projects | 38 |
4 Stakeholder Participation | 73 |
5 Engineering | 87 |
6 A New National Water Management Framework | 98 |
7 Revising Corps of Engineers Planning Studies | 109 |
Appendixes | 127 |
Appendix A Water Resources Development Act 2000 Public Law No 106541 of the 106th Congress | 129 |
Appendix B Corps Divisions and Districts | 132 |
Appendix C Office of Management and Budgets Guidance on Nonmarket Valuation Techniques | 134 |
Appendix D Analysis of Nonstructural Flood Damage Reduction | 136 |
Appendix E Army Corps of Engineers Planning Center of Expertise | 138 |
Appendix F Rosters | 142 |
Appendix G Biographical Information of Panel Members and Staff | 147 |