Analytical Methods and Approaches for Water Resources Project PlanningNational Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Ocean Studies Board, Water Science and Technology Board, Committee to Assess the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Methods of Analysis and Peer Review for Water Resources Project Planning, Panel on Methods and Techniques of Project Analysis National Academies Press, 2004. gada 30. aug. - 165 lappuses Analytical Methods and Approaches for Water Resources Project Planningis part of a larger study that was conducted in response to a request from the U.S. Congress in the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 for the National Academy of Sciences to review the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's peer review methods and analytical approaches. This report reviews the Corps' analytical procedures and planning methods, largely in the context of the federal Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies, also known as the Principles and Guidelines or "P and G" (P&G), as well as the Corps' Planning Guidance Notebook (PGN). |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 50.
... .......35 3 ASSESSING BENEFITS AND COSTS OF CORPS PROJECTS ...............................................................38 Federal Water Resources Planning and Evaluation...........38 Benefit-Cost Analysis in Water Project Planning....
... benefits, costs, optimization, etc.) with a view toward developing and refining planning methods to better serve the nation. As appropriate, the panel should also consider the methods, techniques, and practices employed by other federal ...
... costs and benefits associated with a proposed water project. The P&G relies heavily upon predictive models and monetization techniques as the basis for water resources investment decisions. The theories and methods within the P&G ...
... Benefit-Cost Analysis Pursuant to federal legislation and administration directives, a proposed water project is viable only if its projected benefits exceed projected costs as documented in a Corps planning study. Although this rule ...
... benefits and costs. But it should be used only as one criterion in reaching final judgment on a proper alternative ... benefit-cost analysis. Rather than being the product of lengthy analysis (as currently embodied within the P&G) ...
Saturs
1 | |
11 | |
17 | |
3 Assessing Benefits and Costs of Corps Projects | 38 |
4 Stakeholder Participation | 73 |
5 Engineering | 87 |
6 A New National Water Management Framework | 98 |
7 Revising Corps of Engineers Planning Studies | 109 |
Appendixes | 127 |
Appendix A Water Resources Development Act 2000 Public Law No 106541 of the 106th Congress | 129 |
Appendix B Corps Divisions and Districts | 132 |
Appendix C Office of Management and Budgets Guidance on Nonmarket Valuation Techniques | 134 |
Appendix D Analysis of Nonstructural Flood Damage Reduction | 136 |
Appendix E Army Corps of Engineers Planning Center of Expertise | 138 |
Appendix F Rosters | 142 |
Appendix G Biographical Information of Panel Members and Staff | 147 |