Analytical Methods and Approaches for Water Resources Project PlanningNational Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Ocean Studies Board, Water Science and Technology Board, Committee to Assess the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Methods of Analysis and Peer Review for Water Resources Project Planning, Panel on Methods and Techniques of Project Analysis National Academies Press, 2004. gada 30. aug. - 165 lappuses Analytical Methods and Approaches for Water Resources Project Planningis part of a larger study that was conducted in response to a request from the U.S. Congress in the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 for the National Academy of Sciences to review the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's peer review methods and analytical approaches. This report reviews the Corps' analytical procedures and planning methods, largely in the context of the federal Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies, also known as the Principles and Guidelines or "P and G" (P&G), as well as the Corps' Planning Guidance Notebook (PGN). |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 29.
... coordinating committee that was convened by the National Academies' Water Science and Technology Board (lead) and Ocean Studies Board to carry out studies mandated in the Water Resources Development Act of 2000. The members of the two ...
... coordinating committee to follow these panels' progress and to write a synthesis report. Our study panels and coordinating committee held several meetings over the course of the study period beginning in 2001. We spoke with dozens of ...
... Coordinating Committee for the Section 216 Studies, also merits special mention, as he provided an abundance of constructive and tactful advice and suggestions and served as a continuing source of insight for the panel's deliberations ...
... Coordinating National Water Policy Resolving inconsistencies within the body of national water policy, and resolving ... coordinate water resources policies and activities among the Administration, the Congress, the States, and federal ...
... Coordinating Committee provides more detailed advice on the role of study authorities in improving water planning decisions). 6. Periodic reviews of completed projects should be a routine part of Corps water project planning and ...
Saturs
1 | |
11 | |
17 | |
3 Assessing Benefits and Costs of Corps Projects | 38 |
4 Stakeholder Participation | 73 |
5 Engineering | 87 |
6 A New National Water Management Framework | 98 |
7 Revising Corps of Engineers Planning Studies | 109 |
Appendixes | 127 |
Appendix A Water Resources Development Act 2000 Public Law No 106541 of the 106th Congress | 129 |
Appendix B Corps Divisions and Districts | 132 |
Appendix C Office of Management and Budgets Guidance on Nonmarket Valuation Techniques | 134 |
Appendix D Analysis of Nonstructural Flood Damage Reduction | 136 |
Appendix E Army Corps of Engineers Planning Center of Expertise | 138 |
Appendix F Rosters | 142 |
Appendix G Biographical Information of Panel Members and Staff | 147 |