Analytical Methods and Approaches for Water Resources Project PlanningNational Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Ocean Studies Board, Water Science and Technology Board, Committee to Assess the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Methods of Analysis and Peer Review for Water Resources Project Planning, Panel on Methods and Techniques of Project Analysis National Academies Press, 2004. gada 30. aug. - 165 lappuses Analytical Methods and Approaches for Water Resources Project Planningis part of a larger study that was conducted in response to a request from the U.S. Congress in the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 for the National Academy of Sciences to review the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's peer review methods and analytical approaches. This report reviews the Corps' analytical procedures and planning methods, largely in the context of the federal Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies, also known as the Principles and Guidelines or "P and G" (P&G), as well as the Corps' Planning Guidance Notebook (PGN). |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 12.
... agency's programs in a wider context. Because we appreciate the importance of the U.S. Congress and the sitting ... agency chart its way for the next century. Leonard Shabman Chair, Coordinating Committee Preface The U.S. Army Corps of ...
... agency could generally rely upon widespread congressional and public support for its civil works projects. An area in which the Corps was not traditionally criticized was the quality of the agency's planning and evaluation methods and ...
... agency's planning methods and decisions are carefully scrutinized, and that internally inconsistent federal legislation and other policy directives generally do not provide clear project management objectives. Corps planners use the P&G ...
... agency's planning procedures. Moreover, many Corps planning decisions today do not focus on a traditional emphasis of new civil works construction, but rather on operations of existing projects, which frequently entails the very ...
... agency's highly visible planning studies. Changes in budgetary constraints and congressional priorities, changes in philosophies of successive administrations, shifts in social preferences, and changing planning paradigms have converged ...
Saturs
1 | |
11 | |
17 | |
3 Assessing Benefits and Costs of Corps Projects | 38 |
4 Stakeholder Participation | 73 |
5 Engineering | 87 |
6 A New National Water Management Framework | 98 |
7 Revising Corps of Engineers Planning Studies | 109 |
Appendixes | 127 |
Appendix A Water Resources Development Act 2000 Public Law No 106541 of the 106th Congress | 129 |
Appendix B Corps Divisions and Districts | 132 |
Appendix C Office of Management and Budgets Guidance on Nonmarket Valuation Techniques | 134 |
Appendix D Analysis of Nonstructural Flood Damage Reduction | 136 |
Appendix E Army Corps of Engineers Planning Center of Expertise | 138 |
Appendix F Rosters | 142 |
Appendix G Biographical Information of Panel Members and Staff | 147 |