...to the needs of its constituent groups. Pp. 18-19. (c) As long as the special treatment of Indians can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward Indians, such legislative judgments will not be disturbed. Pp. 1920. 359 F. Supp. 585, reversed and remanded....

...racially-based classification violative of the equal protection clause, stating As long as the special treatment can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians, such legislative judgments will not be disturbed. Slip opinion, 16, quoting Morton v....

...to the needs of its constituent groups. Pp. 18-19. (c) As long as the special treatment of Indians can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress" unique obligation toward Indians, such legislative judgments will not be disturbed. Pp. 1920. 359 F. Supp. 585, reversed and remanded....

...that singles out Indians for particular and special treatment .... As long as the special treatment can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians, such legislative judgments will not be disturbed. Here, where the preference is reasonable...

...implicit in earlier decisions: 213 Indian legislation is constitutional if ". . . the special treatment can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians . . . ."-" Although Native Hawaiians cannot properly be called "American Indians" in an...

...singles out Indians for particular and special treatment." ******* "As long as the special treatment can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians, such legislative judgments will not be disturbed." Id., at 555. As recently as April 27,...

...singles out Indians for particular and special treatment will be upheld as long as the special treatment can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians. 94 S.Ct. at 2485. To the same effect is Delaware Tribal Business Committee v. Weeks, —...

...singles out Indians for particular and special treatment." ******* "As long as the special treatment can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians, such legislative judgments will not be disturbed." Id., at 555. As recently as April 27,...

...legislation that singles out Indians for particular and special treatment. As long as the special treatment can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress' unique obligation toward the Indians, such legislative judgments will not he disturbed. Here, where the preference is reasonable...

...and implicitly from the Constitution itself." The Court said that "As long as the special treatment can be tied rationally to the fulfillment of Congress" unique obligation toward the Indians, such legislative judgments will not be disturbed." Similarly, in United States v. Antelope,...