 | United States. Supreme Court - 1874 - 726 lapas
...difficult to bring the case within any recognized rule of novelty by which the patent can be sustained. The use of one material instead of another in constructing...a known machine is, in most cases, so obviously a mattor of mere mechanical judgment, and not of invention, that it cannot be called an invention, unless... | |
 | Charles Sidney Whitman - 1875 - 814 lapas
...difficult to bring the case within any recognized rule of novelty by which the patent can be sustained. The use of one material instead of another in constructing...called an invention, unless some new and useful result, an increase of efficiency, or a decided saving in the operation, is clearly attained. Some evidence... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (2nd Circuit) - 1877 - 648 lapas
...within the principle which was enunciated in Hii-ka v. Kelsey, (18 Wall., 673): Dal ton r. Nelson. " The use of one material instead of another, in constructing...called an invention, unless some new and useful result, an increase of efficiency, or a decided saving in the operation, is clearly attained." Here, the substitution... | |
 | 1877 - 558 lapas
...was intimated very clearly in the case of Hick» v. Keleey, 18 Wall. 670, where it was said •• the use of one material instead of another in constructing a known machine is, m most cages, so obviously a matter of mere mechanical judgment, and not of invention, that it cannot... | |
 | 1878 - 620 lapas
...intimated very clearly in the case of Hicks vs. Kelsey, 18 "Wall., 670, where it was said " the nse of one material instead of another in constructing...result, where a machine has acquired new functions ::nd useful properties, it may be patentable as an invention, though the only change made in the machine... | |
 | 1903 - 1108 lapas
...Kelsey, 18 Wall. 670, 21 L. Ed. 852. In Hicks v. Kelsey, cited above, the rule is stated as follows : "The use of one material instead of another In constructing...judgment, and not of Invention, that It cannot be called invention, unless some new and useful result, an increase of efficiency, or a decided saving In the... | |
 | Hubert Ashley Banning, United States. Circuit Courts - 1881 - 746 lapas
...the case of Gardnerv. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Company, 3 Off. Gaz., 295, considered. The rule that the use of one material, instead of another, in constructing...most cases, so obviously a matter of mere mechanical construction, that it cannot be called an invention, is not applicable where the substituted material... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (6th Circuit), William Searcy Flippin - 1881 - 754 lapas
...248) and Hicks v. Kelsey, (18 Wall. 670) referred to and discussed, as also the conditions under which the use of one material instead of another in constructing a known machine or article may be patentable. 5. When an invention has been patented in England by a third nerson:... | |
 | Hubert Ashley Banning, United States. Circuit Courts - 1882 - 752 lapas
...Bisbee invention comes within the principle which was enunciated in Hicks v. Kehey, 18, Wall., 673 : " The use of one material instead of another in constructing a known machine, is, in more cases, so obviously a matter of mere mechanical judgment, and not of invention, that it cannot... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1889 - 634 lapas
...See Invention, 4. Change in Size. See Invention, 4; Particular Patents, 23. Change of Material. 1. The use of one material instead of another in constructing...useful result, as increase of efficiency or a decided PACK. saving in the operation, be obtained. But where there is some such new and useful result, where... | |
| |
The use of one material instead of another in constructing a known machine is, in most cases, so obviously a matter of mere mechanical judgment, and not of invention, that it cannot be called an invention, unless some new and useful result, as increase... 
