Copyright Infringement Remedies and Nursing Home/videocassette Copyright: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 671 ... and H.R. 3158 ... April 5, 1990
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Administration of Justice
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990 - 412 lappuses
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
acceptable action activities additional agree agreement American Association Attitudes and Practices attorney's fees attorneys authorized award believe bill Building Cardin cassettes Chairman charge Committee companies Concerning Congress considered copies Copyright Law copyright owners Copyright Violators Corporation cost courts covered Current Copyright Law Dear Director educational effect elderly Employees exemption facilities films grant hearing House individual industry infringement institutions interest issue KASTENMEIER Lakewood Research legislation letter libraries license limited litigation living major March matter means motion picture MPLC nursing home objectives offer Office organizations party percent persons plaintiffs Practices prevailing problem produce programs proposed protection public performance question reasonable Representatives require residents Respondents Roth Senator small business solution statement studios Subcommittee suggest TABLE Thank United viewing Warner Bros Washington
63. lappuse - publicly" means (1) to perform or display it at a place open to the public or at any place where a substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances is gathered...
204. lappuse - Appeals articulated the following twelve guidelines: (1) the time and labor required; (2) the novelty and difficulty of the questions; (3) the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; (4) the preclusion of other employment by the attorney due to acceptance of the case; (5) the customary fee; (6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent...
72. lappuse - In any civil action under this title, the court in its discretion may allow the recovery of full costs by or against any party other than the United States or an officer thereof. Except as otherwise provided by this title, the court may also award a reasonable attorney's fee to the prevailing party as part of the costs.
70. lappuse - That in all actions, suits, or proceedings under this Act, except when brought by or against the United States or any officer thereof, full costs shall be allowed, and the court may award to the prevailing party a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs.
17. lappuse - One of the principal purposes of the definition was to make clear that, contrary to the decision in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Distributing Corp. v. Wyatt, 21 CO Bull. 203 (D. Md. 1932), performances in "semipublic" places such as clubs, lodges, factories, summer camps, and schools are "public performances" subject to copyright control.
203. lappuse - ... fees, from the fund or property itself or directly from the other parties enjoying the benefit. That rule has been consistently followed. . . . Also, a court may assess attorneys' fees for the "willful disobedience of a court order ... as part of the fine to be levied on the defendant, Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co., 261 US 399, 426-428 ... or when the losing party has "acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons.
58. lappuse - Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. It's a pleasure to be here.
32. lappuse - Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of further assistance in this matter. Sincerely, (S) ALFRED B. Fnr. JOINT PROJECTS Senator ELLENDER. The request includes $9.4 million for "Joint projects.
70. lappuse - The amount of money frequently involved in copyright litigation, especially on the part of the defendant, is trifling. The expense of any litigation is considerable. Unless, therefore, some provision is made for financial protection to a litigant, if successful, it may not pay a party to defend rights, even If valid, a situation opposed to Justice...