The Power to Regulate Corporations and Commerce: A Discussion of the Existence, Basis, Nature, and Scope of the Common Law of the United StatesG. P. Putnam's sons, 1906 - 516 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
ix. lappuse
... Railroad Rate Law . The author's conclusion is that the power of the government of the United States to regulate corpora- tions and commerce is ample and that it should be exercised fully in accordance with Gladstone's plan of " working ...
... Railroad Rate Law . The author's conclusion is that the power of the government of the United States to regulate corpora- tions and commerce is ample and that it should be exercised fully in accordance with Gladstone's plan of " working ...
xxv. lappuse
... & Jephson , 1 Campbell , 185 Cas . 846 . . Bondholders v . Railroad Commissioners , Case No. 1625 , 3 Fed . Boom Co. v . Patterson , 98 U. S. , 403 126 87 289 153 347 , 355 Booth v . Town of Woodbury , 32 Conn . Table of Cases XXV.
... & Jephson , 1 Campbell , 185 Cas . 846 . . Bondholders v . Railroad Commissioners , Case No. 1625 , 3 Fed . Boom Co. v . Patterson , 98 U. S. , 403 126 87 289 153 347 , 355 Booth v . Town of Woodbury , 32 Conn . Table of Cases XXV.
xxxi. lappuse
... 460 Cross v . Peach Bottom Ry . Co. , 90 Pa . St. , 392 Crossman v . Lurmax , 192 U. S. , 189 Cross v . Railroad Co. , 35 W. Va . , 174 . • 275 440 70 , 74 , 79 58 79 Crump v . Commonwealth , 84 Va . , 927 Table of Cases xxxi.
... 460 Cross v . Peach Bottom Ry . Co. , 90 Pa . St. , 392 Crossman v . Lurmax , 192 U. S. , 189 Cross v . Railroad Co. , 35 W. Va . , 174 . • 275 440 70 , 74 , 79 58 79 Crump v . Commonwealth , 84 Va . , 927 Table of Cases xxxi.
lvi. lappuse
... Railroad Commission Cases , 116 U. S. , 307 Railroad Co. v . Auditor General , 53 Mich . , 91 133 , 137 , 138 , 468 • 325 , 327 , 348 v . Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. , 60 Md . , 263 v . Bamhill , 91 Tenn . , 395 v . Bank of Ashland , 22 ...
... Railroad Commission Cases , 116 U. S. , 307 Railroad Co. v . Auditor General , 53 Mich . , 91 133 , 137 , 138 , 468 • 325 , 327 , 348 v . Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. , 60 Md . , 263 v . Bamhill , 91 Tenn . , 395 v . Bank of Ashland , 22 ...
lvii. lappuse
... Railroad Co. v . Bowling Green , 57 Ohio St. , 336 v . Bristol , 151 U. S. , 556 . 345 v . Brownell , 24 N. Y. , v . California , 162 U. S. , 125 v . Cary , 26 N. Y. , 25 • • v . Commissioners , 78 Fed . , 236 v . Delaware , 114 U. S. ...
... Railroad Co. v . Bowling Green , 57 Ohio St. , 336 v . Bristol , 151 U. S. , 556 . 345 v . Brownell , 24 N. Y. , v . California , 162 U. S. , 125 v . Cary , 26 N. Y. , 25 • • v . Commissioners , 78 Fed . , 236 v . Delaware , 114 U. S. ...
Saturs
1 | |
2 | |
15 | |
21 | |
27 | |
39 | |
45 | |
54 | |
62 | |
64 | |
68 | |
69 | |
80 | |
93 | |
100 | |
107 | |
110 | |
118 | |
126 | |
139 | |
145 | |
153 | |
165 | |
171 | |
177 | |
182 | |
195 | |
201 | |
207 | |
213 | |
219 | |
228 | |
234 | |
239 | |
246 | |
254 | |
260 | |
266 | |
273 | |
327 | |
334 | |
341 | |
355 | |
369 | |
384 | |
395 | |
408 | |
416 | |
422 | |
426 | |
429 | |
432 | |
434 | |
441 | |
449 | |
454 | |
458 | |
464 | |
465 | |
471 | |
473 | |
478 | |
479 | |
484 | |
486 | |
489 | |
496 | |
498 | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
The Power to Regulate Corporations and Commerce: A Discussion of the ... Frank Hendrick Priekšskatījums nav pieejams - 2017 |
The Power to Regulate Corporations and Commerce: A Discussion of the ... Frank Hendrick Priekšskatījums nav pieejams - 2019 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
15 Wall Adams Express Co Ass'n asserted authority Bridge charter Chicago citizens City common law Congress Conn Constitution contract County Cranch created Dartmouth College decision declare due process E. C. Knight Co eight amendments exercise Federal foreign corporation Fourteenth Amendment franchise grant Harvard Law Review held Illinois impair incorporation individual Insurance interstate commerce jurisdiction Justice land legislative legislature liability liberty limited Louisville Mass ment municipal corporation N. J. Eq National Bank national government national law Ohio State Auditor opinion Pacific R. R. persons police power political poration principle private corporation process of law protection purpose question R. R. Co railroad Railway reserved power restraint of trade rule self-government sovereign sovereignty statute stockholders Supreme Court taxation theory tion towns Union United vested Wheat York
Populāri fragmenti
351. lappuse - The legislature cannot delegate its power to make a law; but it can make a law to delegate a power to determine some fact or state of things upon which the law makes, or intends to make, its own action depend. To deny this would be to stop the wheels of government. There are many things upon which wise and useful legislation must depend which cannot be known to the law-making power, and, must, therefore, be a subject of inquiry and determination outside of the halls of legislation.
467. lappuse - It is a maxim not to be disregarded that general expressions, in every opinion, are to be taken in connection with the case in which those expressions are used. If they go beyond the case, they may be respected, but ought not to control the judgment in a subsequent suit when the very point is presented for decision.
185. lappuse - The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and, like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it. If the former part of the alternative be true, then a legislative act contrary to the constitution is not law; if the latter part be true, then written constitutions are absurd attempts on the part of the people to limit a power in its own nature illimitable.
185. lappuse - Certainly all those who have framed written Constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be that an act of the Legislature repugnant to the Constitution is void...
184. lappuse - To what purpose are powers limited and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may at any time be passed by those intended to be restrained ? The distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed, and if acts prohibited and acts allowed are of equal obligation.
184. lappuse - That the people have an original right to establish for their future government such principles as, in their opinion, shall most conduce to their own happiness, is the basis on which the whole American fabric has been erected. The exercise of this original right is a very great exertion, nor can it nor ought it to be frequently repeated. The principles therefore so established are deemed fundamental. And as the authority from which they proceed is supreme and can seldom act, they are designed to...
317. lappuse - If, as has always been understood, the sovereignty of congress, though limited to specified objects, is plenary as to those objects, the power over commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, is vested in congress as absolutely as it would be in a single government, having in its constitution the same restrictions on the exercise of the power as are found in the constitution of the United States.
335. lappuse - From what has thus been said it is not to be inferred that this power of limitation or regulation is itself without limit. This power to regulate is not a power to destroy, and limitation is not the equivalent of confiscation. Under pretense of regulating fares and freights, the state cannot require a railroad corporation to carry persons or property without reward : neither can it do that which in law amounts to a taking of private property for public use without Just compensation, or without due...
337. lappuse - The question of the reasonableness of a rate of charge for transportation by a railroad company, involving as it does the element of reasonableness both as regards the company and as regards the public, is eminently a question for judicial investigation, requiring due process of law for its determination.
336. lappuse - If the company is deprived of the power of charging reasonable rates for the use of its property, and such deprivation takes place in the absence of an investigation by judicial machinery, it is deprived of the lawful use of its property, and thus, in substance and effect, of the property itself, without due process of law and in violation of the Constitution of the United States...