CROSS, Respondent, v. SECURITY TRUST & LIFE INS. CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 10, 1902.) John W. Brainsby and Vincent Rosemon, for appellant. Charles M. Demond, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (58 App. Div. 602, 69 N. Y. Supp. 189) affirmed, with costs.

PARKER, O. J., and GRAY, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

CUDLIP, Respondent, V. NEW YORK EVENING JOURNAL PUB. CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 17, 1902.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the appellate division of the supreme court in the First judicial department, entered April 5, 1902 (70 App. Div. 617, 75 N. Y. Supp. 1123), affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion was made upon the ground that the court of appeals had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Thomas P. Wickes, James Hillhouse, and William H. Law, for the motion. Clarence J. Shearn, opposed. No opinion. Motion de nied, with $10 costs.

DIMON, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO. et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 14, 1902.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the appellate division of the supreme court in the Second judicial department, entered June 23, 1902 (74 App. Div. 626, 77 N. Y. Supp. 1125), affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion was made upon the ground that the exceptions appearing in the record were frivolous and without merit. J. Addison Young, for the motion. John F. Brennan, opposed. No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.

In re DOHENY et al. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 27, 1902.) Alexander II. Cowie, for appellants. A. D. Jenney, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order (70 App. Div. 370, 75 N. Y. Supp. 24) affirmed, with costs.

GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, VANN, and WERNER, JJ., concur. PARKER, C. J., and CULLEN, J., not voting.

DORNEY, Respondent, v. O'NEILL, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 7, 1902.) David B. Hill and Eugene Lamb Richards, Jr., for appellant. Charles Steckler and Levin L. Brown, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (60 App. Div. 19, 69 N. Y. Supp. 729) affirmed, with costs.

PARKER, C. J., and BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur. O'BRIEN, J., not voting.

DUNICAN, Respondent, v. UNION RY. CO. OF NEW YORK CITY, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 27, 1902.) Frank A. Irish, Charles F. Brown and Henry A. Robinson, for appellant. William J. Martin and John F. Foley, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (56 App. Div. 181, 67 N. Y. Supp. 649) affirmed, with costs.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

In re EDISON ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. OF BROOKLYN. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 24, 1902.) Frank Harvey Field and Edward M. Shepard, for appellant. George L. Rives, Corp. Counsel (James McKeen, of counsel), for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order (72 App. Div. 632, 76 N. Y. Supp. 1013) affirmed, with costs.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, HAIGHT, VANN, and WERNER, JJ., concur. O'BRIEN and CULLEN, JJ., dissent.

FALK et al., Respondents, v. AMERICAN WEST INDIES TRADING CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 18, 1902.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment entered May 6, 1902 (71 App. Div. 320, 75 N. Y. Supp. 964), upon an order of the appellate division of the supreme court in the First judicial department, affirming an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at special term. The motion was made upon the grounds that the record presents no question for review by the court of appeals and that the judgment and order are not appealable. Morris S. Wise, for the motion. Isaac M. Aron, opposed. No opinion. Motion granted, and appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion.

FOGERTY, Appellant, v. UNION RY. CO. OF NEW YORK CITY, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 10, 1902.) Archibald C. Shenstone and William E. Stillings, for appellant. T. H. Lord, Charles F. Brown, Henry Melville, and Henry A. Robinson, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (56 App. Div. 624, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1133) affirmed, with costs PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, HAIGHT, and WERNER, JJ., concur. MARTIN, VANN and CULLEN, JJ., not voting.

FOGERTY, Appellant, v. UNION RY. CO. OF NEW YORK CITY, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 14, 1902.) No opinion. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. See 171 N. Y. 670, supra.

FRANCIS v. WATKINS et al. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 24, 1902.) Louis

Marshall, for appellant. George A. Strong, for respondent Francis. Atterbury & Mullally, for respondents Watkins et al.

PER CURIAM. Order (72 App. Div. 15, 76 N. Y. Supp. 106) affirmed, with costs.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

FRANK, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 10, 1902.) Charles Stewart Davison, Charles F. Brown, Henry Melville, and Henry A. Robinson, for appellant. William H. Ford and William T. Gilbert, for respondent.

PER OURIAM. Judgment (58 App. Div. 100, 68 N. Y. Supp. 537) affirmed, with costs.

BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and WERNER, JJ., concur. PARKER, C. J., and CULLEN, J., dissent.

FRANKENSTEIN et al. v. HAMBURGER et al. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 21, 1902.) Leonard Bronner and A. H. Parkhurst, for appellants. Max L. Schallek, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the order appealed from was made in an action, and not in a special proceeding. See 73 App. Div. 352, 76 Ñ. Y. Supp. 818.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT. HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

GENEVA MINERAL SPRINGS CO., Limited, Respondent, v. COURSEY, Appellant, et al. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 10, 1902.) Charles A. Hawley and George L. Bachman, for appellant. John Gillette, for respond

ent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (57 App. Div. 620, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1133) modified by deducting the sum of $1,760, with interest from May 3, 1900, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs to either party.

PARKER, C. J., and BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

GILBERT et al., Respondents, v. WARREN et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 10, 1902.) Ira D. Warren and Lyman E. Warren, for appellants. John E. Parsons, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (56 App. Div. 289, 67 N. Y. Supp. 978) affirmed, with costs.

PARKER, O. J., and BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

GILDEA, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 29, 1902.) Charles F. Brown and Henry A. Robinson, for appellant. Otto H. Droege, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (58 App. Div. 528, 69 N. Y. Supp. 568) affirmed, with costs. PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

In re GLENDINNING'S ESTATE. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 24, 1902.)` Wil64 N.E-71

Symmes, Jr., for appellant. William B. Putney and Edmonds Putney, for respondent. PER CURIAM. Judgment (57 App. Div. 627, 68 N. Y. Supp. 1139) affirmed, with costs. GRAY, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur. PARKER, C. J., not sitting.

HAWE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK, W. & C. TRACTION CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 14, 1902.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment entered May 6, 1902 (72 App. Div. 631, 76 N. Y. Supp. 1015), upon an order of the appellate division of the supreme court in the Second judicial department, affirming an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at special term. The motion was made upon the grounds that the judgment was interlocutory and, therefore, not appealable, and that, the appellate division having unanimously decided that the findings of fact were supported by the evidence, the case did not present any question of law for review. Arthur M. Johnson, for the motion. Augustus Van Wyck and Charles W. Church, Jr., opposed. No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.

HENTZ, Appellant, v. HAVEMEYER et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 7, 1902.) Barclay E. V. McCarty, William D. Guthrie, and Jared G. Baldwin, Jr., for appellant. John E. Parsons, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (58 App. Div. 36, 68 N. Y. Supp. 440) affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

HOWE, Respondent, v. LANGLEY, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 27, 1902.) Edward W. Davidson, for appellant. M. E. Harby, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

In re J. W. GILLIS CO. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 24, 1902.) William De Graff and John Warrant Castleman, for appellant. John A. Barhite, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order (73 App. Div. 76 N. Y. Supp. 1017) affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

KELLER et al., Appellants, v. LEE, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 14, 1902.) Motion to withdraw an appeal from an order of the appellate division of the supreme court in the Fourth judicial department, entered November 18, 1901 (66 App. Div. 184, 72 N. Y. Supp. 948), reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and an order denying a motion for a new trial, and granting a new trial. L. H. Jones, for the motion. Loran L. Lewis, Jr., opposed. No opinion. Motion granted, upon paying the taxable costs of this appeal and $10 costs of motion.

KERVAN, Appellant, v. TOWNSEND, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 29, 1902.) Edmund L. Mooney and Frederick A. Card, for appellant. William Porter Allen, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (56 App. Div. 625, 68 N. Y. Supp. 1141) affirmed, with costs. PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, and VANN, JJ., concur.

KING, Appellant, v. KING, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 14, 1902.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the appellate division of the supreme court in the Second judicial department. entered June 23, 1902 (73 App. Div. 547, 77 N. Y. Supp. 40), affirming a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and an order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion was made upon the ground that the court of appeals had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal; the record presenting no question of law for review. Daniel E. Delavan, for the motion. G. Burchard Smith, opposed. No opinion. Motion granted, and appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion.

In re KING'S ESTATE. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 21, 1902.) W. E. Kisselburgh, Jr., and H. Louis Jacobson, for appellant. Clarence E. Thornall, for respondents. PER CURIAM. Order (71 App. Div. 581, 76 N. Y. Supp. 220) affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

KINNEY, Appellant, v. DEVENDORF et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 10, 1902.) Louis L. Waters, for appellaut. Edwin Nottingham, I. R. Devendorf, and H. W. Steele, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (55 App. Div. 640, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1137) affirmed, with costs. PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

LAUTZ v. WILLIAMS et al. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 27, 1902.) Tracy C. Becker, for appellant. Charles M. Hughson, Adelbert Moot, Frank F. Williams, and Arthur H. Williams, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (57 App. Div. 622, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1137) affirmed, with costs. PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, and CULLEN, JJ., concur.

LEVY, Respondent, v. SCHREYER, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 14, 1902.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the appellate division of the supreme court in the First judicial department, entered November 11, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court ou trial at special term. The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal was not taken within one year after the filing of the final judgment of the appellate division. Seward Baker, for the motion. Alex. Thain, opposed. No opinion. Motion granted, and appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.

MCCANN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK & Q. C. RY. CO., Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 7, 1902.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment entered upon an order of the appellate division of the supreme court in the First judicial department, made at the June term, 1902 (73 App. Div. 305, 76 N. Y. Supp. 684), which reversed a judgment of the trial court, setting aside a verdict and granting a new trial, and directed judgment upon the verdict. The motion was made upon the ground that the court of ap peals had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Michael P. O'Connor, for the motion. William E. Stewart, opposed. No opinion. Motion granted, and appeal dismissed, with costs.

MCGUIRE, Appellant, v. BOARD, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 10, 1902.) M. P. O'Connor and J. Brownson Ker, for appellant. Western W. Wager, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (58 App. Div. 888, 68 N. Y. Supp. 1026) affirmed, with costs. PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

MACKAY-SMITH et al., Appellants, v. CRAWFORD et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. May 29, 1902.) Henry De Forest Baldwin, for appellants. William E. Cook, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (56 App. Div. 136, 67 N. Y. Supp. 541) affirmed, with costs. PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, and VANN, JJ., concur.

MARRIAN, Appellant, v. ANTHONY et al., Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 10, 1902.) James A. Ward, for appellant. F. B. Pitcher and G. S. & H. L. Hooker, for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (57 App. Div. 621, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1139) affirmed, with costs. PARKER. C. J., and BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

MASONS' SUPPLIES CO., Respondent, v. JONES, Appellant, et al. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 7, 1902.) J. Alexander Koones, for appellant. George B. Dunu, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (58 App. Div. 231, 68 N. Y. Supp. 806) affirmed, with costs. PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

MILLER, Respondent, v. MILES, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 10, 1902.) George D. Beattys, for appellant. William H. Hamilton, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (58 App. Div. 103, 68 N. Y. Supp. 565) affirmed, with costs. PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

MURR, Respondent, v. WESTERN ASSUR. CO. OF TORONTO, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 10, 1902.) George Clinton, for appellant. Simon Fleischmann, Tor respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (57 App. Div. 635, 68 N. Y. Supp. 1144) affirmed, with costs. PARKER, C. J., and BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, and CULLEN, JJ., concur. WERNER, J., not sitting.

NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK OF ALBANY, Appellant, V. LACKAWANNA TRANSP. CO., Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 7, 1902.) John M. Bowers, William Lansing, and Latham G. Reed, for appellant. John G. Milburn, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (59 App. Div. 270, 69 N. Y. Supp. 396) affirmed, with costs. PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

In re NEWCOMB'S ESTATE. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 21, 1902.) George F. Canfield, for appellants. Julius Offenbach. for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order (71 App. Div. 606, 76 N. Y. Supp. 222) affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

In re OAKLEY. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 17, 1902.) No opinion. Motion to amend remittitur granted, so as to allow bills of costs in this court, one to the executors and one to Miss Berlin, payable out of the estate. See 171 N. Y. 652, 63 N. E. 1120.

PEGGO, Respondent, v. DINAN, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 14, 1902.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the appellate division of the supreme court in the Second judicial department, entered May 29, 1902 (72 App. Div. 434, 76 N. Y. Supp. 565), which reversed an order of special term denying a motion by plaintiff to amend a judgment previously entered against him, and granted said motion. The motion was made upon the ground that the order of the appellate division herein was not appeal able to the court of appeals as a matter of right. Jonathan Deyo and John M. Gardner, for the motion. Abram J. Rose and Alfred C. Petté, opposed. No opinion. Motion granted, and appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion.

PELL, Respondent, v. FULLER, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 10, 1902.) Watson M. Rogers and A. E. Kilby, for appellant. Henry W. Bentley, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (57 App. Div. 635, 68 N. Y. Supp. 1145) affirmed, with costs. PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE Respondent, v. DARROW, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 27, 1902.) Maurice Meyer, for appellant. William Travers Jerome, Dist. Atty. (Robert C. Taylor, of counsel), for the People.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (69 App. Div. 615, 74 N. Y. Supp. 1141) of conviction af firmed.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, MARTIN, VANN, and OUL LEN, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. PANYKO et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 10, 1902.) Lewis Stuyvesant Chanler, for appellants. William Travers Jerome, Dist. Atty. (Howard S. Gans, of counsel), for the People.

PER CURIAM. Judgment (71 App. Div. 324, 75 N. Y. Supp. 945) of conviction affirmed.

PARKER, C. J., and BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE, Respondent, v. PATRICK, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 8, 1902.) Motion, under the provision of section 536 of chapter 369 of the Laws of 1902, to extend time in which to move argument of appeal from judgment of death. John C. Tomlinson and Edgar J. Kohler, for the motion. No opinion. Motion denied, on the ground that defendant has six months from September 1, 1902, the time the act took effect, in which to argue the appeal, which time the court deems amply sufficient.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur. VANN, J., dissents.

PEOPLE ex rel. CENTRAL UNION GAS CO., Appellant, v. WELLS et al., Com'rs, Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 21, 1902.) John A. Garver, for appellant. George L. Rives, Corp. Counsel (George S. Coleman and Curtis A. Peters, of counsel), for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order (73 App. Div. 626, 77 N. Y. Supp. 1136) affirmed, with costs.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur. BARTLETT, J., not voting.

PEOPLE ex rel. FALK, Appellant, v. DIKE, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 20, 1902.) Benjamin F. Tracy, Jerry A. Wernberg, Charles H. Hyde and Levi W. Naylor, for appellant. G. D. B. Hasbrouck, Joseph A. Burr, and Ira Leo Bamburger, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs, on authority of In re Guden, 171 N. Y. 529, 64 N. E. 451.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER,

JJ.,

concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. FALK v. GUDEN. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 20, 1902.) Benjamin F. Tracy, Jerry A. Wernberg, Charles H. Hyde, and Levi W. Naylor, for appellants. G. D. B. Hasbrouck, Joseph A. Burr, and Ira Leo Bamburger, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order affirmed, with costs, on authority of In re Guden, 171 N. Y. 529, 64 N. E. 451.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. HUBER, Appellant, v. FEITNER et al., Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments, Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 24, 1902.) Joseph A. Burr and Louis J. Altkrug, for appellant. George L. Rives, Corp. Counsel (George S. Coleman, of counsel), for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order (71 App. Div. 479, 75 N. Y. Supp. 738) affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. LEWIS, Respondent, v. SHERMAN, Appellant. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 24, 1902.) F. E. Lewis and E. Lewis, for appellant. Thomas D. Watkins, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order (66 App. Div. 231, 72 N. Y. Supp. 718) affirmed, on the ground that the relator was not in office, but without costs, as that was not true when the proceeding was instituted.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. SMITH, Appellant, v. SCANNELL, Fire Commissioner, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 27, 1902.) Francis A. McCloskey, for appellant. George L. Rives, Corp. Counsel (James McKeen, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order (71 App. Div. 491, 75 N. Y. Supp. 904) affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. WEISE, Appellant, v. SCANNELL, Fire Com'r, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct 21, 1902.) Daniel F. Kiely and Joseph I. Green, for appellant. George L. Rives, Corp. Counsel (Theodore Connoly, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order (44 App. Div. 642, 61 N. Y. Supp. 1145) affirmed, with costs.

PARKER, C. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. WEST et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF SYRACUSE, Respondent. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 27, 1902.) Francis B. Gill, for appellants. Alexander H. Cowie, for respondent.

PER CURIAM. Order (73 App. Div. ——, 76 N. Y. Supp. 1028) affirmed, with costs, on opinion of special term below.

PARKER, C. J., and GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

PEOPLE ex rel. ZOLLIKOFFER et al., Appellants, v. FEITNER et al., Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments, Respondents. (Court of Appeals of New York. Oct. 21, 1902.) Theodore Sutro, for appellants. George L. Rives, Corp. Counsel (James M. Ward and David Rumsey, of counsel), for respondents.

PER CURIAM. Order (74 App. Div. 130, 77 N. Y. Supp. 436) affirmed, with costs, on the authority of People v. Feitner, 163 N. Y. 384, 57 N. E. 624.

PARKER, O. J., and O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, CULLEN, and WERNER, JJ., concur.

PERSON, Respondent, v. STOLL et al., Appellants. (Court of Appeals of New York. June 24, 1902.) Gilbert W. Minor, for the mo