 objective" and "subjective" proved not to be barbarous enough, by half, long to retain their usefulness in philosophy, even if there had been no other objection to them. The first rule of good taste in writing is to use words whose meanings will not be...  Handbook of Computability Theory - 28. lappuselaboja - 1999 - 724 lapasIerobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu
 | Richard Milton Martin - 1980 - 328 lapas
...attempted to borrow its words. . . . The first rule of good taste in writing is to use words whose meanings will not be misunderstood; and if a reader does not...words, it is infinitely better that he should know that he does not know it." It is in exactitude of thought and its expression that I find Hegel most... | |
 | Robert C. Neville - 1989 - 392 lapas
...no other objection to them. The first rule of good taste in writing is to use words whose meanings will not be misunderstood; and if a reader does not...infinitely better that he should know he does not know it. Further on (par. 226) Peirce established rules for teminology, the sixth of which is this: For philosophical... | |
 | Susan Haack - 2000 - 246 lapas
...deliberately, Peirce writes that "the first rule of good taste in writing is to use words whose meanings will not be misunderstood; and if a reader does not...infinitely better that he should know he does not know it." Hence his insistence that ugliness in philosophical terminology is positively a good thing, that "vocables... | |
| |
