...use without just compensation was designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole. A fair interpretation of this constitutional protection entitles these lien holders to just compensation...

...use without just compensation was designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole. A fair interpretation of this constitutional protection entitles these lienholders to just compensation...

...The Just Compensation Clause was "designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole." Armstrong v. United States, 364 US 40, 49 (1960) ; see also United States v. Opinion of the Court....

...confiscation of private property was designed to prohibit government from "forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole. . . ." * Since it is the public which will benefit, it is only fair that the public fund it. Even if...

...Amendment has been held "to bar government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, 28A in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole". It must be applied on a nondiscriminatory basis, except where property of enemy aliens is 28B involved....

...been described as designed to bar the Government from requiring a limited number of persons to "bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole." (Armstrong v. United States, 364 US 40, 49 (I960)). But no firm rule has been established as to the...

...Amendment's just compensation provision is designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public, as a whole." The State of South Carolina has also recognized when regulations create takings of private property....

...L.Ed. 940 (1934). Regulation amounts to a taking when government forces "some people alone to bear public burdens, which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole." Armstrong v. US, 364 US 40, 49, 80 S.Ct. 1563, 1569, 4 L.Ed.2d 1554 (1960). Accordingly, it must be...

...compensation.- This provision is 'designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole, . . . "— , and to ensure that people may create, acquire and improve property without fear that such...

...The "takings" clause initially was intended "to bar government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole."3 Stated another way, if the government acts to protect or further the public interest by regulating...