The Right to Own Property: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 605, a Bill to Establish a Uniform and More Efficient Federal Process for Protecting Property Owners' Rights Guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, Washington, DC; Salt Lake City, UT; and Washington, DC, April 6, July 3, and October 18, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 402 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
2. lappuse
... environment as well as public health and safety . Those who call this bill flawed should understand that they are , in essence , calling a part of the Bill of Rights flawed in the same breath . It is our purpose to enact this ...
... environment as well as public health and safety . Those who call this bill flawed should understand that they are , in essence , calling a part of the Bill of Rights flawed in the same breath . It is our purpose to enact this ...
19. lappuse
... environment if we stop emit- ting CFC's . But as I read this bill and listen to my friend from Utah , there would be ... environmental laws that we already have . For- get wetlands for a minute . There are a lot 19.
... environment if we stop emit- ting CFC's . But as I read this bill and listen to my friend from Utah , there would be ... environmental laws that we already have . For- get wetlands for a minute . There are a lot 19.
20. lappuse
... environment and , in turn , to us . They would have to go out there and set aside a fund to com- pensate everybody whose property was impacted upon by a third or more who produced CFC's . If that is true , we are talking about a ...
... environment and , in turn , to us . They would have to go out there and set aside a fund to com- pensate everybody whose property was impacted upon by a third or more who produced CFC's . If that is true , we are talking about a ...
21. lappuse
... environment . That costs money , so that is a taking , right ? Mr. SCHMIDT . Yes ; I mean , the question is whether it is a taking in the constitutional sense , but it could be . Senator BIDEN . That is what this bill is talking about ...
... environment . That costs money , so that is a taking , right ? Mr. SCHMIDT . Yes ; I mean , the question is whether it is a taking in the constitutional sense , but it could be . Senator BIDEN . That is what this bill is talking about ...
23. lappuse
... environment , but in a lot of other environments in the last year . Although I know our Constitution does not differen- tiate property rights from big corporations or little individuals- they are all treated the same I think there is a ...
... environment , but in a lot of other environments in the last year . Although I know our Constitution does not differen- tiate property rights from big corporations or little individuals- they are all treated the same I think there is a ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
33 percent acres ADLER administrative agency action American apply CHAIRMAN City Clean Water Act Committee common law CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Constitution contract costs Court of Federal create decision economic Endangered Species Act environment erty example farm farmers Federal Claims Federal Government Fifth Amendment going government regulation habitat harm homeowners impact individual interest issue jurisdiction Justice landowners legislation litigation Lucas LUDWISZEWSKI MARZULLA ment million nuisance exception nuisance law Omnibus Property Rights pensation permit pollution private property owners private property rights problems prop property owners Property Rights Act property values proposed public rights question recognized regulatory takings require compensation RESS restrictions result safety SCHMIDT Section 404 Senator BIDEN Senator DEWINE Senator THURMOND standard statute Supreme Court Takings Clause Thank tion Title U.S. SENATOR U.S. Supreme Court Utah Utah County Utah Lake water rights wetlands WILKINS
Populāri fragmenti
54. lappuse - To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.
270. lappuse - No right to the use of water for land in private ownership shall be sold for a tract, exceeding one hundred and sixty acres to any one landowner, and no such sale shall be made to any landowner unless he be an actual bona fide resident on such land, or occupant thereof residing in the neighborhood of said land, and no such right shall permanently attach until all payments therefor are made.
166. lappuse - Court has described the purpose of this clause in the following terms; "[The] Fifth Amendment's guarantee that private property shall not be taken for a public use without just compensation was designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole.
65. lappuse - Government hardly could go on if to some extent values incident to property could not be diminished without paying for every such change in the general law. As long recognized, some values are enjoyed under an implied limitation and must yield to the police power. But obviously the implied limitation must have its limits, or the contract and due process clauses are gone.
60. lappuse - Court, quite simply, has been unable to develop any "set formula" for determining when "justice and fairness" require that economic injuries caused by public action be compensated by the government, rather than remain disproportionately concentrated on a few persons.
271. lappuse - That nothing in this Act shall be construed as affecting or intended to affect or to in any way interfere with the laws of any State or Territory relating to the control, appropriation, use or distribution of water used in irrigation, or any vested right acquired thereunder, and the Secretary of the Interior, in carrying out the provisions of this Act, shall proceed in conformity with such laws...
191. lappuse - There is perhaps no more impenetrable jungle in the entire law than that which surrounds the word 'nuisance.
54. lappuse - B ) hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be ( 1 ) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right...
271. lappuse - Provided: That the right to the use of water acquired under the provisions of this Act shall be appurtenant to the land irrigated, and beneficial use shall be the basis, the measure, and the limit of the right.
54. lappuse - It shall (A) compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed; and (B) hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be (1) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law...