Cases Decided in United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals: Customs Cases Adjudged in the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, 57. sējumsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals, 1970 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 76.
717. lappuse
... noted in paragraphs ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) of the Examiner's Answer , supra , and as argued by the appellant . " The rejection of claims 2 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 10 , and 12 was affirmed using the following reasoning : ** We see nothing unobvious , but ...
... noted in paragraphs ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) of the Examiner's Answer , supra , and as argued by the appellant . " The rejection of claims 2 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 10 , and 12 was affirmed using the following reasoning : ** We see nothing unobvious , but ...
753. lappuse
... noted that the addition of a limitation to a claim , as distinguished from the substitution of a limitation , can never result in a claim to a different species , since species claims must be mutually exclusive in scope . By including ...
... noted that the addition of a limitation to a claim , as distinguished from the substitution of a limitation , can never result in a claim to a different species , since species claims must be mutually exclusive in scope . By including ...
785. lappuse
... noted in our analysis of the Childress patent , it teaches that if the transfer force of the electric field is not strong enough , a source of air under positive pressure may be applied to the V - shaped region be- hind the image . It ...
... noted in our analysis of the Childress patent , it teaches that if the transfer force of the electric field is not strong enough , a source of air under positive pressure may be applied to the V - shaped region be- hind the image . It ...
786. lappuse
... noted that Childress teaches that the transfer force of the electric field may not be strong enough to overcome a slight vacuum and even after the vacuum is removed , the particles adhere to the surface of the porous member . Faced with ...
... noted that Childress teaches that the transfer force of the electric field may not be strong enough to overcome a slight vacuum and even after the vacuum is removed , the particles adhere to the surface of the porous member . Faced with ...
801. lappuse
... noted above that the use of sheet metal material plus frictional engagement appears in none of the three cited references . Since these limitations are recited in each claim here , the rejection under § 102 is erroneous . Regarding the ...
... noted above that the use of sheet metal material plus frictional engagement appears in none of the three cited references . Since these limitations are recited in each claim here , the rejection under § 102 is erroneous . Regarding the ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
52 CCPA acid affidavit affirming the rejection alleged ALMOND amylose apparatus APPEAL from Patent appealed claims appellant appellant's appellee applicant's application serial Associate Judges attorneys of record BALDWIN Board of Appeals catalyst CCPA circuit Clairol Commissioner of Patents composition compounds comprising conclude considered counsel count Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined delivered the opinion design patent determining disclosed disclosure double patenting electrical evidence examiner examiner's fact fibers film inventorship issue Joseph Schimmel LANE likelihood of confusion limitation magnetic mark material means method mold molten metal obvious Oral argument ordinary skill oxide Patent Appeals Patent Office Patent Office Board plastic position prior art PVDF reaction recited reduction to practice reference registration rejection of claims reversed signal sitting by designation specification statutory subject matter surface temperature terminal disclaimer tion tube U.S. Patent United States Court unpatentable USPQ wherein
Populāri fragmenti
1376. lappuse - Whenever an application is made for a patent which, in the opinion of the Commissioner, would interfere with any pending application, or with any unexpired patent, he shall give notice thereof to the applicants, or applicant and patentee, as the case may be. and shall direct the • primary examiner to proceed to determine the question of priority of invention. And the Commissioner may issue a patent to the party who is adjudged the prior inventor...
766. lappuse - Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subiect to the conditions and requirements of this title.
718. lappuse - An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof, and such claim shall be construed to cover the corresponding structure, material, or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.
1376. lappuse - The Commissioner of Patents, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, may from time to time establish regulations, not inconsistent with law, for the conduct of proceedings in the Patent Office.
807. lappuse - Patent and Trademark Office, or a mark or trade name previously used in the United States by another and not abandoned, as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive...
902. lappuse - An applicant for a patent, any of whose claims has been twice rejected, may appeal from the decision of the primary examiner to the Board of Appeals, having once paid the fee for such appeal.
1247. lappuse - ... b. the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States, or c.
778. lappuse - This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, affirming the final rejection by the examiner of claims 24, 25 and 26, all the claims remaining in the case, application serial No. 219,766, for "Elastomer Compounds and Improved Compounding Process Therefor.
1079. lappuse - This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claim 1, the only remaining claim of appellants
744. lappuse - ... of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.