Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
action amendments appear application assign attorney authority believe bill Bryson Chairman changes claim codification combination Commissioner committee Congress consideration considered constitutes contributory infringement coordinating course CRUMPACKER decisions definition Department direct discovery doctrine effect enacted examiner existing fact FEDERICO fees filed foreign functional give given Government grant hearings held House included industry interest interpretation invention inventor involved issued June Justice language license machine manufacture material matter means ment Mercoid misuse objective obtain opinion owner paragraph particular Patent Law Association Patent Office patent system person possible practice present prior proposed protection provision question reason recommendations record reference relating Representatives respect result revision Rich ROGERS rule sell specific statement statute submitted suggestions suit Supreme Court term thing tion United Washington
13. lappuse - An assignment, grant or conveyance shall be void as against any subsequent purchaser or mortgagee for a valuable consideration, without notice, unless it is recorded in the Patent Office within three months from the date thereof or prior to such subsequent purchase or mortgage.
9. lappuse - Whenever an application is made for a patent which, in the opinion of the Commissioner, would interfere with any pending application, or with any unexpired patent, he shall give notice thereof to the applicants, or applicant and patentee, as the case may be.
9. lappuse - ... upon failure of the applicant to prosecute the same within one year after any action therein, of which notice shall have been given to the applicant, they shall be regarded as abandoned by the parties thereto, unless it be shown to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Patents that such delay was unavoidable...
33. lappuse - Before the applicant's invention thereof the invention was made In this country by another who had not abandoned, suppressed, or concealed it. In determining priority of Invention, there shall be considered not only the respective dates of conception and reduction to practice of the invention, but also the reasonable diligence of one who was first to conceive the last to reduce to practice, from a time prior to conception by the other.
65. lappuse - That is to say, the new device, however useful it may be, must reveal the flash of creative genius, not merely the skill of the calling.
13. lappuse - Whoever sells a component of a patented machine, manufacture, combination or composition, or a material or apparatus for use in practicing a patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to be especially made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of such patent, and not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial noninfringing use, shall be liable as a contributory infringer.
14. lappuse - Upon finding for the claimant the court shall award the claimant damages adequate to compensate for the infringement but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer, together with interests and costs as fixed by the court.
16. lappuse - Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.
188. lappuse - ... known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof, and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country...
140. lappuse - It was never the object of those laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a shade of an idea, which would naturally and spontaneously occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of manufactures.