In accordance with 31 U.S.C. section 720, I am writing you concerning actions by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in response to the recommendations contained in the enclosed report by the General Accounting Office (GAO) entitled Tax Administration: IRS Could Do More To Verify Taxpayer Identities (GGD-95-148, August 30, 1995). The GAO report contains several recommendations geared to addressing the processing and posting of tax returns in which the primary filer does not provide a social security number (SSN) or provides a name and social security number that do not match. Our June 21, 1995, response to GAO on the draft of this report is included in the final report on page 13. We agree with the report recommendations. Listed below are the comments regarding the recommendations: RECOMMENDATION: Finalize the CP54B Notice in time for use during the 1996 tax-filing season. RESPONSE: We agree. The revised CP54B Notice has been reviewed and approved by the Acting Director, Corporate Systems Division for an operational date of January 19, 1996. (See enclosed copy of the response to the Request for Information Services (RIS) TPS-5-0114.) RECOMMENDATION: Apply the revised documentation requirements to RESPONSE: We agree. RIS INT-5-0008 has been approved and assigned to The Honorable Ted Stevens -2 segment be removed, effective January 1, 1996, as is currently done on the valid segment of the Master File. The Assistant Commissioner (Taxpayer Services) staff has coordinated and If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or Anne Raffaelli, National Director for Legislative Affairs, at 622-3720. Enclosures (2) Sincerely, Degay Richard Margaret Milner Richardson As stated www GAO Background United States General Accounting Office General Government Division B-260131 August 30, 1995 The Honorable Margaret M. Richardson Dear Mrs. Richardson: This report, prepared under our basic legislative authority, discusses the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) procedures for processing and posting tax returns in which the primary filer does not provide a Social Security number (SSN) or provides a name and SSN that do not match Social Security Administration (SSA) records.1 In particular, the report discusses (1) the growth in accounts with missing or incorrect SSNs on IRS' Individual Master File (IMF), (2) IRS' procedures for verifying the identities of tax return filers, and (3) the potential effects of the procedures on IRS' plans to modernize the tax system and on IRS' income-matching program. IRS relies on data from SSA to determine the accuracy of SSNs and names recorded on tax documents submitted by individual taxpayers. IRS uses this information to establish the identity of each taxpayer and to ensure that each transaction is posted to the correct account on the IMF. When processing paper tax returns with missing or incorrect SSNS, IRS 'Hereafter, we refer to these returns as returns with missing or incorrect SSNs. IRS follows more stringent procedures for electronically filed returns. Returns filed electronically with missing or incorrect SSNs are rejected and sent back to the filer for correction. IRS assigns temporary numbers when a taxpayer (1) cannot legally obtain an SSN from SSA (such as B-260131 Results in Brief IRS created the invalid segment of the IMF to store the accounts of taxpayers who had changed their names, because of marriage or divorce for example, and had not yet informed SSA of the name change. However, IRS has posted returns to the invalid segment of the IMF to cover other situations, such as when a taxpayer (1) uses the SSN of another individual, (2) uses an SSN that is not issued by SSA, or (3) is assigned a temporary number. IRS tries to resolve invalid accounts and move them to the valid segment of the IMF by corresponding with taxpayers to verify their identities, periodically matching invalid accounts against updated SSA records, and reviewing tax documents subsequently filed by taxpayers. From 1986 through 1994, the average annual growth rate for accounts on As part of its efforts to combat refund fraud, IRS revised its procedures in |