Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1961 - 141 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 32.
35. lappuse
... ference from the patent , is made by the patentee , including all assignees as shown by the records of the Patent Office , the interference will be dissolved pro forma as to such claims . ' " " Rule 264 , also new in the present rules ...
... ference from the patent , is made by the patentee , including all assignees as shown by the records of the Patent Office , the interference will be dissolved pro forma as to such claims . ' " " Rule 264 , also new in the present rules ...
125. lappuse
... ference issue to the senior party , and 2. The Board erred in failing to award priority of invention of the said subject matter to the junior party , 3. The Board erred in finding that the counts consti- tuting the issue of the said ...
... ference issue to the senior party , and 2. The Board erred in failing to award priority of invention of the said subject matter to the junior party , 3. The Board erred in finding that the counts consti- tuting the issue of the said ...
127. lappuse
... ference counts so as to read on the disclosure of the ap- plication of the senior party . 16. That the Board erred in interpreting the inter- ference counts so as to embrace an unpatentable aggrega- tion of elements . 17. That the Board ...
... ference counts so as to read on the disclosure of the ap- plication of the senior party . 16. That the Board erred in interpreting the inter- ference counts so as to embrace an unpatentable aggrega- tion of elements . 17. That the Board ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 17 |
Withdrawal by Primary Examiner | 23 |
Autortiesības | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
72 USPQ 81 USPQ 99 USPQ action under 35 affidavits application or patent assignee Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Botnen burden of proof CADC CCPA Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents considered Corp Court of Customs cross beams Customs and Patent decision Declaration of Interference determination disclosed disclosure dissolve the interference effect Examiner of Interferences February 28 ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor July 19 junior party Manual motion period motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule operation overdrive panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office patentable subject matter Primary Examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question of priority reasons of appeal record reduction to practice request res judicata Rule 94 senior party Set Final Hearing show cause specified subject matter Supp supra tion unpatentable